Type of Sexual Activity Impacts the Discounting of “Safe Sex”

= 44.3 years of age; White (72.3%); heterosexual (81.9%)], recruited from Prolific, completed an online survey where they indicated their willingness to engage in penile-vaginal and penile-anal intercourse with a hypothetical partner, as well as their willingness to give oral sex to and receive oral sex from that person. To determine if the discounting of skin barriers (i.e. condoms and dental dams) varied across these sexual acts, participants then indicated the likelihood they would use a skin barrier based on 1) the sexual act they were randomly assigned to, 2) how long they had to wait for a skin barrier (i.e. delay discounting), and 3) the likelihood of contracting an STI (i.e. probability discounting). For each sexual act, the likelihood of using a skin barrier decreased as the delay to a skin barrier increased, or the probability of contracting an STI decreased. These effects were most pronounced when either giving or receiving oral sex compared to when engaging in penile-vaginal or penile-anal intercourse. Additionally, except for penile-anal intercourse, men and women were equally willing to engage in the specified sexual acts. However, greater discounting of a skin barrier by men was primarily restricted to penile-vaginal intercourse and receiving oral sex. These results have important implications for understanding how the likelihood of using a skin barrier is impacted by the type of sexual activity being engaged in.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Sex Research
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2026.2713073
Primary Topic
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Type of Sexual Activity Impacts the Discounting of “Safe Sex”

Wayne R. Hawley, Bryn A. Cancilla, Angela R. Pinkerton, Bryanna N. Griger
The Journal of Sex Research
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
article

Type of Sexual Activity Impacts the Discounting of “Safe Sex”

Wayne R. Hawley, Bryn A. Cancilla, Angela R. Pinkerton, Bryanna N. Griger
article en

Abstract

= 44.3 years of age; White (72.3%); heterosexual (81.9%)], recruited from Prolific, completed an online survey where they indicated their willingness to engage in penile-vaginal and penile-anal intercourse with a hypothetical partner, as well as their willingness to give oral sex to and receive oral sex from that person. To determine if the discounting of skin barriers (i.e. condoms and dental dams) varied across these sexual acts, participants then indicated the likelihood they would use a skin barrier based on 1) the sexual act they were randomly assigned to, 2) how long they had to wait for a skin barrier (i.e. delay discounting), and 3) the likelihood of contracting an STI (i.e. probability discounting). For each sexual act, the likelihood of using a skin barrier decreased as the delay to a skin barrier increased, or the probability of contracting an STI decreased. These effects were most pronounced when either giving or receiving oral sex compared to when engaging in penile-vaginal or penile-anal intercourse. Additionally, except for penile-anal intercourse, men and women were equally willing to engage in the specified sexual acts. However, greater discounting of a skin barrier by men was primarily restricted to penile-vaginal intercourse and receiving oral sex. These results have important implications for understanding how the likelihood of using a skin barrier is impacted by the type of sexual activity being engaged in.

The Journal of Sex Research
Edinboro University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.