Differential trust incorporation: How immigrants develop institutional trust faster than social trust

Do immigrants develop trust in institutions and trust in people at the same rate? Using World Values Survey Wave 7 data from 21 countries (N = 33,929), this study demonstrates that they do not. Within countries, immigrants score 0.14 points higher than natives on institutional trust but only 0.03 points higher on social trust, producing a fivefold asymmetry we term differential trust incorporation. This pattern reflects different production functions: institutional trust is built through transactions with legible, standardized procedures accessible to newcomers, while social trust requires accumulated relational experience that takes longer to develop. Crucially, the gap narrows with integration. Naturalized citizens show gaps 51% smaller than noncitizens, and second-generation immigrants show gaps indistinguishable from natives. The gap also widens in stronger institutional environments, suggesting immigrants respond to actual institutional characteristics rather than projecting generalized optimism. These findings reframe immigrant trust from a deficit model to a temporal incorporation framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociological Research Online
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13607804261473694
Primary Topic
Social Capital and Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differential trust incorporation: How immigrants develop institutional trust faster than social trust

Muhammad Ichsan Fadillah
Sociological Research Online
Social Capital and Networks
article

Differential trust incorporation: How immigrants develop institutional trust faster than social trust

Muhammad Ichsan Fadillah
article en

Abstract

Do immigrants develop trust in institutions and trust in people at the same rate? Using World Values Survey Wave 7 data from 21 countries (N = 33,929), this study demonstrates that they do not. Within countries, immigrants score 0.14 points higher than natives on institutional trust but only 0.03 points higher on social trust, producing a fivefold asymmetry we term differential trust incorporation. This pattern reflects different production functions: institutional trust is built through transactions with legible, standardized procedures accessible to newcomers, while social trust requires accumulated relational experience that takes longer to develop. Crucially, the gap narrows with integration. Naturalized citizens show gaps 51% smaller than noncitizens, and second-generation immigrants show gaps indistinguishable from natives. The gap also widens in stronger institutional environments, suggesting immigrants respond to actual institutional characteristics rather than projecting generalized optimism. These findings reframe immigrant trust from a deficit model to a temporal incorporation framework.

Sociological Research Online
University of Life Sciences in Poznań (PL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Social Capital and Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.