Final 2‐Year Results of the REFORM Study: A Randomized Trial of Biolimus DCB Versus Paclitaxel DCB for In‐Stent Restenosis

BACKGROUND: In the REFORM trial, treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with a Biolimus A9™ drug-coated balloon (BCB) was found to be inferior with respect to in-segment percentage stenosis at 6-months in comparison to treatment with a standard paclitaxel coated paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB). AIMS: In this manuscript, the final prespecified 2-year clinical follow up follow-up of the REFORM trial is reported. METHODS: The Prospective, Randomized, Non-Inferiority Trial to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of the Biolimus A9™ Drug Coated Balloon for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis: First-in-Man Trial (REFORM) was a multicenter, single blind, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial comparing the BCB and PCB in the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR). The primary angiographic endpoint of the trial was in-segment % diameter stenosis (%DS) at 6 months, which has previously been reported. A total clinical follow-up duration of 2 years was planned. Prespecified clinical outcomes at 2 years were: target lesion failure (TLF), target vessel failure (TVF), and their individual components. RESULTS: At 24 months, complete follow-up data was available for 93% (n = 188) of the intention to treat (ITT) population. The mean age was 68.7 years, and patients were predominantly male (80.2%). Comorbidities were well balanced between the 2 groups, including diabetes mellitus, which was present in 31% of the BCB group and 29.2% of the PCB group. ISR lesions were predominantly DES-ISR in both groups (BCB 80.7% vs. PCB 85.1%). Through to 2 year follow up, target lesion failure (TLF) occurred in 36 of 135 patients (27.8%) of patients in the BCB group and in 15 of 67 patients (23.5%) in the PCB group (HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 0.69-2.29). Clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) occurred in 31 of 135 patients (24.2%) in the BCB group versus 13 of 67 patients (20.4%) in the PCB group (HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.66-2.40). Target vessel myocardial infarction and cardiac death were comparable in both groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with coronary ISR, the final 2-year results from the REFORM study show that TLF rates were 27.8% in the biolimus-coated balloon BCB group and 23.5% in the paclitaxel-coated balloon PCB group. However, given the limited sample size and wide confidence intervals, the present analysis does not permit reliable inference regarding comparative event rates between treatment strategies. The results should be interpreted against the background of demonstrated inferior angiographic performance of the biolimus DCB at 6 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered prospectively at www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (identifier: NCT04079192).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70800
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Final 2‐Year Results of the REFORM Study: A Randomized Trial of Biolimus DCB Versus Paclitaxel DCB for In‐Stent Restenosis

Sean Fitzgerald, Fernándo Alfonso, Samuel Copt, Himanshu Rai et al.
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

Final 2‐Year Results of the REFORM Study: A Randomized Trial of Biolimus DCB Versus Paclitaxel DCB for In‐Stent Restenosis

Sean Fitzgerald, Fernándo Alfonso, Samuel Copt, Himanshu Rai, Daniel O’Callaghan, Rory Durand, Peter O’Kane, Robert A. Byrne, J J Coughlan, Darren Mylotte, Jasper Trevelyan, Antonio Fernández Ortiz, Franz Xever Kleber, Jochen Wöhrle, Marie‐Claude Morice, Giuilo Stefanini, Joo‐Yong Hahn, Ralph Toelg, Manel Sabate
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the REFORM trial, treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with a Biolimus A9™ drug-coated balloon (BCB) was found to be inferior with respect to in-segment percentage stenosis at 6-months in comparison to treatment with a standard paclitaxel coated paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB). AIMS: In this manuscript, the final prespecified 2-year clinical follow up follow-up of the REFORM trial is reported. METHODS: The Prospective, Randomized, Non-Inferiority Trial to Determine the Safety and Efficacy of the Biolimus A9™ Drug Coated Balloon for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis: First-in-Man Trial (REFORM) was a multicenter, single blind, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial comparing the BCB and PCB in the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR). The primary angiographic endpoint of the trial was in-segment % diameter stenosis (%DS) at 6 months, which has previously been reported. A total clinical follow-up duration of 2 years was planned. Prespecified clinical outcomes at 2 years were: target lesion failure (TLF), target vessel failure (TVF), and their individual components. RESULTS: At 24 months, complete follow-up data was available for 93% (n = 188) of the intention to treat (ITT) population. The mean age was 68.7 years, and patients were predominantly male (80.2%). Comorbidities were well balanced between the 2 groups, including diabetes mellitus, which was present in 31% of the BCB group and 29.2% of the PCB group. ISR lesions were predominantly DES-ISR in both groups (BCB 80.7% vs. PCB 85.1%). Through to 2 year follow up, target lesion failure (TLF) occurred in 36 of 135 patients (27.8%) of patients in the BCB group and in 15 of 67 patients (23.5%) in the PCB group (HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 0.69-2.29). Clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) occurred in 31 of 135 patients (24.2%) in the BCB group versus 13 of 67 patients (20.4%) in the PCB group (HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.66-2.40). Target vessel myocardial infarction and cardiac death were comparable in both groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with coronary ISR, the final 2-year results from the REFORM study show that TLF rates were 27.8% in the biolimus-coated balloon BCB group and 23.5% in the paclitaxel-coated balloon PCB group. However, given the limited sample size and wide confidence intervals, the present analysis does not permit reliable inference regarding comparative event rates between treatment strategies. The results should be interpreted against the background of demonstrated inferior angiographic performance of the biolimus DCB at 6 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered prospectively at www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (identifier: NCT04079192).

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Humanitas University (IT), Wittenberg University (US), Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE), Royal Bournemouth Hospital (GB), Samsung Medical Center (KR), University Hospital Galway (IE), Hospital Clínico San Carlos (ES), Hospital de Nens de Barcelona (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (ES), Worcestershire Royal Hospital (GB), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (ES), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES), Biosensores (Spain) (ES), Mater Private Hospital (AU), Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud (FR), Segeberger Kliniken (DE), University Hospital in Halle (DE), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE), Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.