Sustainability accounting for interconnectivity: addressing a critical methodological challenge

Purpose To develop a research method for evaluating accounting for sustainability from the perspective of governing organisational interconnections within dynamic socio-ecological systems. Design/methodology/approach We develop a research method that evaluates differences between the expected and the accounted-for interconnections between an organisation, its activities and the resilience of the socio-ecological systems it is embedded in. This method is designed to identify interconnections that are unaccounted for, inappropriately accounted for and appropriately accounted for. This method can be integrated with established sustainability accounting research methods, providing additional insights from sustainability science and complex adaptive systems by articulating (mis)alignments of organisational accounting with requirements for governing the resilience of socio-ecological systems and sustainable transformation programmes. Findings We apply a three-stage method to a case study to illustrate its feasibility and confirm its potential to provide additional insights in this and other empirical contexts. In this case, the combination of omitted and inappropriately accounted for interconnections was problematically misaligned with the organisation's sustainability strategy. Managers in the organisation reported that this analysis offered a pathway for developing more appropriate accounting to inform their sustainability governance and sector-wide transformation. Originality/value We contribute to the literature on accounting for sustainability by proposing a method for evaluating accounting for interconnectivity, a critical attribute for sustainable transformation. We illustrate the possibilities created through a resilience-informed method built on a normative framework that incorporates an explicit consideration of the essential accounting attributes of the interconnections between an accounting object, sustainable governance, the consequences of any actions by an accounting object and resilient socio-ecological systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-10-2022-6075
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainability accounting for interconnectivity: addressing a critical methodological challenge

Helen Tregidga, Iris Burgia, Ian Thomson, Massimo Contrafatto
Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Sustainability accounting for interconnectivity: addressing a critical methodological challenge

Helen Tregidga, Iris Burgia, Ian Thomson, Massimo Contrafatto
article en

Abstract

Purpose To develop a research method for evaluating accounting for sustainability from the perspective of governing organisational interconnections within dynamic socio-ecological systems. Design/methodology/approach We develop a research method that evaluates differences between the expected and the accounted-for interconnections between an organisation, its activities and the resilience of the socio-ecological systems it is embedded in. This method is designed to identify interconnections that are unaccounted for, inappropriately accounted for and appropriately accounted for. This method can be integrated with established sustainability accounting research methods, providing additional insights from sustainability science and complex adaptive systems by articulating (mis)alignments of organisational accounting with requirements for governing the resilience of socio-ecological systems and sustainable transformation programmes. Findings We apply a three-stage method to a case study to illustrate its feasibility and confirm its potential to provide additional insights in this and other empirical contexts. In this case, the combination of omitted and inappropriately accounted for interconnections was problematically misaligned with the organisation's sustainability strategy. Managers in the organisation reported that this analysis offered a pathway for developing more appropriate accounting to inform their sustainability governance and sector-wide transformation. Originality/value We contribute to the literature on accounting for sustainability by proposing a method for evaluating accounting for interconnectivity, a critical attribute for sustainable transformation. We illustrate the possibilities created through a resilience-informed method built on a normative framework that incorporates an explicit consideration of the essential accounting attributes of the interconnections between an accounting object, sustainable governance, the consequences of any actions by an accounting object and resilient socio-ecological systems.

Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), Birmingham City University (GB), University of Sussex (GB), University of Dundee (GB), Royal Holloway University of London (GB), Sussex County Community College (US), University College Birmingham (GB), Film Independent (US), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.