The Paradox of Belonging and Distinction: The Influence of Social Face on Utilitarian and Hedonic Smartphone Use in China

Grounded in face negotiation theory and integrated with uses and gratifications theory and the technology acceptance model, this study explores how social face influences utilitarian and hedonic smartphone use in China. The findings of a survey of 725 smartphone users reveal that face gain positively predicts hedonic smartphone use and exerts a stronger influence on hedonic use than on utilitarian use. While face-loss avoidance did not directly predict utilitarian use, it positively moderates the effect of perceived usefulness on utilitarian smartphone use. These results confirm the dual-mechanism nature of the paradox of belonging and distinction: whereas face gain acts as an explicit engine for social distinction through hedonic play, face-loss avoidance functions as a defensive anchor that reinforces utility to ensure social inclusion in a collectivistic cultural context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communication and the Public
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20570473261477124
Primary Topic
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Paradox of Belonging and Distinction: The Influence of Social Face on Utilitarian and Hedonic Smartphone Use in China

Linsen Su, Xigen Li
Communication and the Public
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
article

The Paradox of Belonging and Distinction: The Influence of Social Face on Utilitarian and Hedonic Smartphone Use in China

Linsen Su, Xigen Li
article en

Abstract

Grounded in face negotiation theory and integrated with uses and gratifications theory and the technology acceptance model, this study explores how social face influences utilitarian and hedonic smartphone use in China. The findings of a survey of 725 smartphone users reveal that face gain positively predicts hedonic smartphone use and exerts a stronger influence on hedonic use than on utilitarian use. While face-loss avoidance did not directly predict utilitarian use, it positively moderates the effect of perceived usefulness on utilitarian smartphone use. These results confirm the dual-mechanism nature of the paradox of belonging and distinction: whereas face gain acts as an explicit engine for social distinction through hedonic play, face-loss avoidance functions as a defensive anchor that reinforces utility to ensure social inclusion in a collectivistic cultural context.

Communication and the Public
Shanghai University (CN), Beijing Jiaotong University (CN), Shantou University (CN)
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.