Socio-contextual barriers in AI adoption: Examining awareness and perceptions in the technology acceptance model

From healthcare to education, commerce to the workplace, today AI offers significant gains. Yet the realisation of these gains may not be equally distributed. Previous research into digital exclusion demonstrates how some societal groups are less able to leverage the benefits of technology, and already data is revealing socially stratified differences in people's perceptions and attitudes towards AI. Relatedly, due to the often-opaque integration of AI into everyday technologies, public awareness of AI is low, and evidence would suggest this too is a factor likely to be impacted by issues of digital exclusion. Given that we know perception drives technology adoption but do not yet know the impact of awareness in this trajectory, it is imperative we empirically measure these relationships from the perspective of societal inequities. Using data collected via two public surveys ( N = 305, 303), this paper extends the Technology Acceptance Model using a novel measure of awareness to better understand pathways to AI adoption. Our estimates are consistent with: (1) AI adoption pathways being largely similar to other technologies; (2) a lack of AI awareness impeding pathways to AI adoption; and (3) socio-contextual factors driving differences in awareness of AI. Ensuring all people in society can and do successfully adopt AI technologies requires modelling its unique properties and examining how these properties themselves may be subject to societal inequities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heliyon
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2026.e45279
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socio-contextual barriers in AI adoption: Examining awareness and perceptions in the technology acceptance model

Melanie J. McGrath, Sarah V. Bentley, David Evans
Heliyon
AI in Service Interactions
article

Socio-contextual barriers in AI adoption: Examining awareness and perceptions in the technology acceptance model

Melanie J. McGrath, Sarah V. Bentley, David Evans
article en

Abstract

From healthcare to education, commerce to the workplace, today AI offers significant gains. Yet the realisation of these gains may not be equally distributed. Previous research into digital exclusion demonstrates how some societal groups are less able to leverage the benefits of technology, and already data is revealing socially stratified differences in people's perceptions and attitudes towards AI. Relatedly, due to the often-opaque integration of AI into everyday technologies, public awareness of AI is low, and evidence would suggest this too is a factor likely to be impacted by issues of digital exclusion. Given that we know perception drives technology adoption but do not yet know the impact of awareness in this trajectory, it is imperative we empirically measure these relationships from the perspective of societal inequities. Using data collected via two public surveys ( N = 305, 303), this paper extends the Technology Acceptance Model using a novel measure of awareness to better understand pathways to AI adoption. Our estimates are consistent with: (1) AI adoption pathways being largely similar to other technologies; (2) a lack of AI awareness impeding pathways to AI adoption; and (3) socio-contextual factors driving differences in awareness of AI. Ensuring all people in society can and do successfully adopt AI technologies requires modelling its unique properties and examining how these properties themselves may be subject to societal inequities.

HeliyonVol. 12(14)
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), Data61 (AU)
Australian Government, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.