Anatomical Characteristics of the Facial Nerve in Patients With Cochlear Hypoplasia

ABSTRACT Objective To quantitatively characterize the spatial relationships between intratemporal facial nerve segments and key cochlear implantation (CI) landmarks in cochlear hypoplasia (CH), and to compare these features with age‐matched CI recipients with normal inner ear anatomy, thereby informing preoperative planning and facial nerve preservation strategies. Methods CI recipients were reviewed retrospectively, and high‐resolution temporal bone CT datasets were reconstructed. The measured parameters comprised cochlear–facial partition width (CFPW) of the labyrinthine segment, the distance between the tympanic facial nerve and oval window (FN‑OW), the distance between the mastoid facial nerve and round window (FN‑RW), the angle between the FN‑RW line and the anteroposterior axis (α), and the distance from the mastoid facial nerve to the posterior external auditory canal wall (FN‑EAC). Results The CH cohort included 48 patients (91 ears: 40 CH‑Ⅱ, 43 CH‑Ⅲ, 8 CH‑Ⅳ); controls comprised 45 patients (90 ears). The median CFPW was larger in CH patients than in controls (0.7 vs. 0.57 mm; p < 0.01). Cochlear–facial dehiscence occurred at similar rates (CH 4.40% vs. controls 4.44%). FN‐OW did not differ significantly between the two groups (2.33 vs. 2.37 mm; p = 0.198). A low‑lying tympanic segment was observed in 23.07% of CH ears but in none of the control ears. For the mastoid (vertical) segment, the CH group exhibited a shorter FN‐RW (5.74 vs. 6.08 mm; p < 0.05) and a larger angle α (60.4° vs. 57.8°; p < 0.05). FN‐EAC was slightly smaller in the CH group without reaching statistical significance (4.08 vs. 4.35 mm; p = 0.087). Conclusion In CH, intratemporal facial nerve segments exhibit substantial positional variability. Anterior displacement of the vertical segment is common and may impede round window exposure via the facial recess. Preoperative HRCT should systematically assess nerve courses to reduce intra‐ and postoperative facial nerve complications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.70134
Primary Topic
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anatomical Characteristics of the Facial Nerve in Patients With Cochlear Hypoplasia

Shujin Xue, Xingmei Wei, Yong‐Xin Li, Biao Chen et al.
World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
article

Anatomical Characteristics of the Facial Nerve in Patients With Cochlear Hypoplasia

Shujin Xue, Xingmei Wei, Yong‐Xin Li, Biao Chen, Ying Kong
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective To quantitatively characterize the spatial relationships between intratemporal facial nerve segments and key cochlear implantation (CI) landmarks in cochlear hypoplasia (CH), and to compare these features with age‐matched CI recipients with normal inner ear anatomy, thereby informing preoperative planning and facial nerve preservation strategies. Methods CI recipients were reviewed retrospectively, and high‐resolution temporal bone CT datasets were reconstructed. The measured parameters comprised cochlear–facial partition width (CFPW) of the labyrinthine segment, the distance between the tympanic facial nerve and oval window (FN‑OW), the distance between the mastoid facial nerve and round window (FN‑RW), the angle between the FN‑RW line and the anteroposterior axis (α), and the distance from the mastoid facial nerve to the posterior external auditory canal wall (FN‑EAC). Results The CH cohort included 48 patients (91 ears: 40 CH‑Ⅱ, 43 CH‑Ⅲ, 8 CH‑Ⅳ); controls comprised 45 patients (90 ears). The median CFPW was larger in CH patients than in controls (0.7 vs. 0.57 mm; p < 0.01). Cochlear–facial dehiscence occurred at similar rates (CH 4.40% vs. controls 4.44%). FN‐OW did not differ significantly between the two groups (2.33 vs. 2.37 mm; p = 0.198). A low‑lying tympanic segment was observed in 23.07% of CH ears but in none of the control ears. For the mastoid (vertical) segment, the CH group exhibited a shorter FN‐RW (5.74 vs. 6.08 mm; p < 0.05) and a larger angle α (60.4° vs. 57.8°; p < 0.05). FN‐EAC was slightly smaller in the CH group without reaching statistical significance (4.08 vs. 4.35 mm; p = 0.087). Conclusion In CH, intratemporal facial nerve segments exhibit substantial positional variability. Anterior displacement of the vertical segment is common and may impede round window exposure via the facial recess. Preoperative HRCT should systematically assess nerve courses to reduce intra‐ and postoperative facial nerve complications.

World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Beijing Tongren Hospital (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.