Categorical storage of de-prioritized visual working memory content

Categorical storage of de-prioritized visual working memory content Surya Gayet, Dan Wang, Samson Chota, Stefan van der Stigchel Abstract Multiple items can be maintained in visual working memory (VWM) with different levels of priority (e.g., relevant now versus later). An emerging view, largely based on neuroimaging work, is that VWM content is stored in early visual cortex only when fine-grained detail is required. This occurs when items are prioritized, for instance to support precise recall or perceptual comparison. Instead, when VWM content is deprioritized, storage relies more on downstream regions, including parietal cortex where representations were shown to be more categorical. This framework leads to a clear prediction. If deprioritized items are stored in regions that do not support fine detail, then retrieving them into a prioritized state should reveal a loss of precision. Critically, such representations should also become more categorical. We tested this prediction using an existing dataset of three experiments (Wang et al., 2025). Participants memorized two colors for two consecutive delayed reproduction tasks using a continuous color wheel. One item was prioritized (cued for imminent report), whereas the other was temporarily deprioritized (relevant for later report). To quantify categorical structure, we conducted separate behavioral experiments (using the same experimental setup as Wang et al.) to identify color categories and map their prototypes and boundaries. Results showed that recall precision was lower for previously deprioritized items, indicating information loss. Also, color reports were generally biased toward (rather than away from) category prototypes, demonstrating influences of category membership on recall. Crucially, this bias was strongest for previously deprioritized items. These findings show that deprioritized VWM contents are stored in a more categorical format, consistent with a transfer from early visual cortex to higher-level regions. Although this flexibility supports efficient resource allocation, it comes at a cost: transfers are not lossless and systematically transform memory content. Categorical coding may support robust behavior in natural contexts, despite reduced precision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21979375
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Categorical storage of de-prioritized visual working memory content

Surya Gayet, Stefan Van der Stigchel, Samson Chota, Dan Wang
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Categorical storage of de-prioritized visual working memory content

Surya Gayet, Stefan Van der Stigchel, Samson Chota, Dan Wang
article en

Abstract

Categorical storage of de-prioritized visual working memory content Surya Gayet, Dan Wang, Samson Chota, Stefan van der Stigchel Abstract Multiple items can be maintained in visual working memory (VWM) with different levels of priority (e.g., relevant now versus later). An emerging view, largely based on neuroimaging work, is that VWM content is stored in early visual cortex only when fine-grained detail is required. This occurs when items are prioritized, for instance to support precise recall or perceptual comparison. Instead, when VWM content is deprioritized, storage relies more on downstream regions, including parietal cortex where representations were shown to be more categorical. This framework leads to a clear prediction. If deprioritized items are stored in regions that do not support fine detail, then retrieving them into a prioritized state should reveal a loss of precision. Critically, such representations should also become more categorical. We tested this prediction using an existing dataset of three experiments (Wang et al., 2025). Participants memorized two colors for two consecutive delayed reproduction tasks using a continuous color wheel. One item was prioritized (cued for imminent report), whereas the other was temporarily deprioritized (relevant for later report). To quantify categorical structure, we conducted separate behavioral experiments (using the same experimental setup as Wang et al.) to identify color categories and map their prototypes and boundaries. Results showed that recall precision was lower for previously deprioritized items, indicating information loss. Also, color reports were generally biased toward (rather than away from) category prototypes, demonstrating influences of category membership on recall. Crucially, this bias was strongest for previously deprioritized items. These findings show that deprioritized VWM contents are stored in a more categorical format, consistent with a transfer from early visual cortex to higher-level regions. Although this flexibility supports efficient resource allocation, it comes at a cost: transfers are not lossless and systematically transform memory content. Categorical coding may support robust behavior in natural contexts, despite reduced precision.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Utrecht University (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.