The stars, compass, and anchor: how relationships shape first-year students’ perception of their access to disciplinary content

This article explores how academic relationships shape first-year university students’ engagement with and perceived access to acquiring disciplinary content knowledge. Drawing on a reflexive thematic analysis of interviews with 25 students across 10 programmes and employing Self-Determination Theory as an analytical lens, the study examines how relationships influence students’ motivation, engagement, and sense of academic belonging. The findings reveal that relationships with lecturers, teaching assistants, and peers both facilitate and constrain the perceived access to disciplinary content. Lecturers often appear as distant stars – highly knowledgeable yet sometimes inaccessible – while teaching assistants act as guiding compasses, helping students navigate academic complexity. Peers function as anchors, providing support and belonging but occasionally reinforcing uncertainty and pressure. The analysis further exposes how the quality of these relationships shapes students’ perceived access to disciplinary knowledge. Dedicated and pedagogically skilled lecturers enhance the perceived access to learning, yet assumptions about prior knowledge or over-familiarity can limit it. Teaching assistants serve effectively as ‘academic translators’ when approachable and supportive, but may become obstacles when their roles are ambiguous or their demeanour distant. Peers foster safety and reflection, though competitive dynamics can generate exclusion and comparison. Interpreted through the psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness, the findings highlight relatedness as central to disciplinary learning. The study calls for greater recognition of the relational dimensions of academic integration and the often-overlooked role of teaching assistants in supporting first-year students’ academic development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Higher Education
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2026.2718800
Primary Topic
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The stars, compass, and anchor: how relationships shape first-year students’ perception of their access to disciplinary content

Laura Cordes Felby, Rikke Trige Jensen, Mathilde Fibiger
Studies in Higher Education
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
article

The stars, compass, and anchor: how relationships shape first-year students’ perception of their access to disciplinary content

Laura Cordes Felby, Rikke Trige Jensen, Mathilde Fibiger
article en

Abstract

This article explores how academic relationships shape first-year university students’ engagement with and perceived access to acquiring disciplinary content knowledge. Drawing on a reflexive thematic analysis of interviews with 25 students across 10 programmes and employing Self-Determination Theory as an analytical lens, the study examines how relationships influence students’ motivation, engagement, and sense of academic belonging. The findings reveal that relationships with lecturers, teaching assistants, and peers both facilitate and constrain the perceived access to disciplinary content. Lecturers often appear as distant stars – highly knowledgeable yet sometimes inaccessible – while teaching assistants act as guiding compasses, helping students navigate academic complexity. Peers function as anchors, providing support and belonging but occasionally reinforcing uncertainty and pressure. The analysis further exposes how the quality of these relationships shapes students’ perceived access to disciplinary knowledge. Dedicated and pedagogically skilled lecturers enhance the perceived access to learning, yet assumptions about prior knowledge or over-familiarity can limit it. Teaching assistants serve effectively as ‘academic translators’ when approachable and supportive, but may become obstacles when their roles are ambiguous or their demeanour distant. Peers foster safety and reflection, though competitive dynamics can generate exclusion and comparison. Interpreted through the psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness, the findings highlight relatedness as central to disciplinary learning. The study calls for greater recognition of the relational dimensions of academic integration and the often-overlooked role of teaching assistants in supporting first-year students’ academic development.

Studies in Higher Education
Aarhus University (DK)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.