Does board independence moderate the relationship between corporate social responsibility and choice of capital structure? Evidence from Saudi Arabia

Although corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become increasingly significant in shaping corporate decisions, the impact of CSR disclosure on capital structure (CS) choice remains poorly understood. This study examines whether CSR disclosure affects firms’ choice of CS. It also considers the potential moderating effect of board independence (BIND) on this relationship. Using 828 firm-year observations of Saudi-listed firms from 2016 to 2021, we find that firms with higher CSR disclosure rely more on internal financing. With respect to external financing, greater CSR disclosure is associated with increased use of debt but reduced reliance on equity. BIND strengthens the relationship between CSR and both internal and equity financing, but weakens its association with debt financing. These findings imply that firms with highly independent boards place greater emphasis on internal financing and rely more on equity. These findings are robust across several regression specifications and alternative measures. This study contributes to the literature by providing new evidence on how CSR disclosure shapes different components of capital structure and by highlighting the moderating role of BIND in corporate financing decisions, with important implications for policymakers seeking to promote sustainable finance in line with Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-08427-x
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does board independence moderate the relationship between corporate social responsibility and choice of capital structure? Evidence from Saudi Arabia

Bazeet Olayemi Badru, Wan Nordin Wan‐Hussin, Sumaia Ayesh Qaderi, Tahir Akhtar et al.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Does board independence moderate the relationship between corporate social responsibility and choice of capital structure? Evidence from Saudi Arabia

Bazeet Olayemi Badru, Wan Nordin Wan‐Hussin, Sumaia Ayesh Qaderi, Tahir Akhtar, Shoaib Khan, Ameen Qasem
article en

Abstract

Although corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become increasingly significant in shaping corporate decisions, the impact of CSR disclosure on capital structure (CS) choice remains poorly understood. This study examines whether CSR disclosure affects firms’ choice of CS. It also considers the potential moderating effect of board independence (BIND) on this relationship. Using 828 firm-year observations of Saudi-listed firms from 2016 to 2021, we find that firms with higher CSR disclosure rely more on internal financing. With respect to external financing, greater CSR disclosure is associated with increased use of debt but reduced reliance on equity. BIND strengthens the relationship between CSR and both internal and equity financing, but weakens its association with debt financing. These findings imply that firms with highly independent boards place greater emphasis on internal financing and rely more on equity. These findings are robust across several regression specifications and alternative measures. This study contributes to the literature by providing new evidence on how CSR disclosure shapes different components of capital structure and by highlighting the moderating role of BIND in corporate financing decisions, with important implications for policymakers seeking to promote sustainable finance in line with Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
University of Ha'il (SA), Taylor's University (MY), University of Business and Technology (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.