Optimizing bacterial enrichment procedures to improve mosquito midgut microbiome research

Abstract Mosquitoes are major vectors of infectious diseases, with their midgut microbiota playing a crucial role in host development, reproduction, and pathogen interactions. However, characterizing midgut microbial communities remains challenging because host DNA often dominates metagenomic libraries, reducing the resolution of bacterial community profiling and hindering the recovery of microbial genomes. To evaluate strategies for bacterial DNA enrichment in this context, we compared three DNA extraction protocols applied to pooled Aedes aegypti midguts: (i) the QIAGEN DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit without filtration (DNeasy NF), (ii) the same kit preceded by a 5 μm filtration step to reduce eukaryotic material (DNeasy F), and (iii) the QIAGEN QIAamp Microbiome kit, which combines differential host cell lysis and enzymatic DNA depletion. Each method was assessed using qPCR-based quantification of bacterial and host DNA, SSU rRNA-based taxonomic profiling of metagenomic reads, and Metagenome-Assembled Genomes (MAGs) reconstruction using advanced binning approaches. Our results show that while the Microbiome kit provided the highest bacterial enrichment and captured a large fraction (> 85%) of the bacterial taxa detected with the other kits, it yielded a higher relative abundance of Gammaproteobacteria . This occurred without a loss of overall diversity, suggesting improved recovery of microbial taxa rather than a compositional bias. The filtration step associated with the DNeasy kit significantly reduced host DNA but also lowered bacterial material, allowing MAG reconstruction, though less efficiently than the Microbiome kit. Despite this, the DNeasy methods allowed recovering a broader range of bacterial phyla with a more even distribution across taxa, while each extraction method also detected a unique set of NTUs. Overall, a combination of DNA extraction methods may be necessary to optimize microbiome analysis in mosquito midguts, facilitating a more comprehensive understanding of microbial diversity and its potential applications in vector control strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animal Microbiome
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-026-00614-0
Primary Topic
Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing bacterial enrichment procedures to improve mosquito midgut microbiome research

Hans Schrieke, Blandine Trouche, Julie Réveillaud, Emilie Pondeville et al.
Animal Microbiome
Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
article

Optimizing bacterial enrichment procedures to improve mosquito midgut microbiome research

Hans Schrieke, Blandine Trouche, Julie Réveillaud, Emilie Pondeville, David Kerrigan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Mosquitoes are major vectors of infectious diseases, with their midgut microbiota playing a crucial role in host development, reproduction, and pathogen interactions. However, characterizing midgut microbial communities remains challenging because host DNA often dominates metagenomic libraries, reducing the resolution of bacterial community profiling and hindering the recovery of microbial genomes. To evaluate strategies for bacterial DNA enrichment in this context, we compared three DNA extraction protocols applied to pooled Aedes aegypti midguts: (i) the QIAGEN DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit without filtration (DNeasy NF), (ii) the same kit preceded by a 5 μm filtration step to reduce eukaryotic material (DNeasy F), and (iii) the QIAGEN QIAamp Microbiome kit, which combines differential host cell lysis and enzymatic DNA depletion. Each method was assessed using qPCR-based quantification of bacterial and host DNA, SSU rRNA-based taxonomic profiling of metagenomic reads, and Metagenome-Assembled Genomes (MAGs) reconstruction using advanced binning approaches. Our results show that while the Microbiome kit provided the highest bacterial enrichment and captured a large fraction (> 85%) of the bacterial taxa detected with the other kits, it yielded a higher relative abundance of Gammaproteobacteria . This occurred without a loss of overall diversity, suggesting improved recovery of microbial taxa rather than a compositional bias. The filtration step associated with the DNeasy kit significantly reduced host DNA but also lowered bacterial material, allowing MAG reconstruction, though less efficiently than the Microbiome kit. Despite this, the DNeasy methods allowed recovering a broader range of bacterial phyla with a more even distribution across taxa, while each extraction method also detected a unique set of NTUs. Overall, a combination of DNA extraction methods may be necessary to optimize microbiome analysis in mosquito midguts, facilitating a more comprehensive understanding of microbial diversity and its potential applications in vector control strategies.

Animal Microbiome
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), Maladies Infectieuses et Vecteurs: Écologie, Génétique, Évolution et Contrôle (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), MRC University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research (GB), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.