Stability through rupture: elite splits and coalition realignment in Serbia and Montenegro

This article challenges the assumption that elite splits inherently destabilise autocratic regimes. It proposes that some elite ruptures facilitate adaptive reorganisation, through three stabilising functions: first, elimination of horizontal conflict and internal constraints through exclusion; second, reduction of vertical pressure by reallocating resources toward co-optation; and third, attenuation of democratisation pressure through programmatic reorientation. Conversely, the article shows that cohesive coalition-building can constrain regimes’ adaptive capacity. The argument is developed through the comparison of Serbia and Montenegro, contrasting three stabilising elite splits (Serbia 1987; Montenegro 1989, 1997) with one destabilising rupture (Montenegro 2016) and the decline of one cohesive regime (Serbia 2000).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
East European Politics
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2026.2714007
Primary Topic
Balkans: History, Politics, Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stability through rupture: elite splits and coalition realignment in Serbia and Montenegro

Claudia Laštro
East European Politics
Balkans: History, Politics, Society
article

Stability through rupture: elite splits and coalition realignment in Serbia and Montenegro

Claudia Laštro
article en

Abstract

This article challenges the assumption that elite splits inherently destabilise autocratic regimes. It proposes that some elite ruptures facilitate adaptive reorganisation, through three stabilising functions: first, elimination of horizontal conflict and internal constraints through exclusion; second, reduction of vertical pressure by reallocating resources toward co-optation; and third, attenuation of democratisation pressure through programmatic reorientation. Conversely, the article shows that cohesive coalition-building can constrain regimes’ adaptive capacity. The argument is developed through the comparison of Serbia and Montenegro, contrasting three stabilising elite splits (Serbia 1987; Montenegro 1989, 1997) with one destabilising rupture (Montenegro 2016) and the decline of one cohesive regime (Serbia 2000).

East European Politics
University of Graz (AT)
Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, Folke Bernadotteakademin
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Balkans: History, Politics, Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.