Caffeine content, pH, and brightness of decaffeinated robusta coffee beans using controlled maceration machine, and the sensory of the coffee brew

This study aims to improve the efficiency and speed of decaffeination through maceration extraction using a Controlled Maceration Machine. Using water as a solvent offers a simpler, safer, and more environmentally friendly approach. It has considerable potential as an economically feasible and sustainable decaffeination technology, particularly for small-scale coffee processing industries. The study combines two treatments: temperature and duration of maceration. The maceration durations used are 2, 4, and 6 h. The extraction temperatures used are 50, 60, and 70 °C. Based on De Garmo’s effectiveness test, the best treatment was found to be at a temperature of 60 °C and a duration of 4 h. At 60 °C for 4 h, heat energy is sufficient to increase the heat and mass transfer coefficients without causing significant damage to the cell wall structure. Consequently, caffeine release is rapid and selective, while loss of flavor and bioactive compounds is minimal. The decaffeinated robusta coffee with the best treatment has a brightness value of 34.3; a pH value of 6.56; a caffeine content of 0.40% (decrease 79,17% from control); a color preference of 5.1 (Somewhat Liked); an aroma preference of 4.8 (Neutral); a taste preference of 3.9 (Somewhat Disliked); and an overall preference of 4.4 (Neutral).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Food
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44187-026-01216-0
Primary Topic
Coffee research and impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Caffeine content, pH, and brightness of decaffeinated robusta coffee beans using controlled maceration machine, and the sensory of the coffee brew

Endar Hidayat, Asmak Afriliana, Novizar Nazir, Muhammad Baharudin Najmi et al.
Discover Food
Coffee research and impacts
article

Caffeine content, pH, and brightness of decaffeinated robusta coffee beans using controlled maceration machine, and the sensory of the coffee brew

Endar Hidayat, Asmak Afriliana, Novizar Nazir, Muhammad Baharudin Najmi, Triana Lindriati, Giyarto Cipto Widodo, Aloysius Prakosa
article en

Abstract

This study aims to improve the efficiency and speed of decaffeination through maceration extraction using a Controlled Maceration Machine. Using water as a solvent offers a simpler, safer, and more environmentally friendly approach. It has considerable potential as an economically feasible and sustainable decaffeination technology, particularly for small-scale coffee processing industries. The study combines two treatments: temperature and duration of maceration. The maceration durations used are 2, 4, and 6 h. The extraction temperatures used are 50, 60, and 70 °C. Based on De Garmo’s effectiveness test, the best treatment was found to be at a temperature of 60 °C and a duration of 4 h. At 60 °C for 4 h, heat energy is sufficient to increase the heat and mass transfer coefficients without causing significant damage to the cell wall structure. Consequently, caffeine release is rapid and selective, while loss of flavor and bioactive compounds is minimal. The decaffeinated robusta coffee with the best treatment has a brightness value of 34.3; a pH value of 6.56; a caffeine content of 0.40% (decrease 79,17% from control); a color preference of 5.1 (Somewhat Liked); an aroma preference of 4.8 (Neutral); a taste preference of 3.9 (Somewhat Disliked); and an overall preference of 4.4 (Neutral).

Discover Food
National Institute for Materials Science (JP), Universitas Jember (ID), Andalas University (ID)
Universitas Jember
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Coffee research and impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.