Are claims to “put people first” associated with operational efficiency? The moderating role of institutional alignment

Purpose This study aims to draw on signaling and informal institutions theories to hypothesize that the employee-centric signals emitted by corporations do not aim at meeting solely the expectations of prospective and current employees but also the institutional pressures that constraint and influence a firm’s action and choice. Design/methodology/approach In support of these predictions, the association between the visibility of employee-centric signals in the corporate websites of 282 Fortune 500 firms and measures of operational performance like Return on Sales and annual gains in Earnings per Share were strongest among firms operating in service industries as well as among firms employing large numbers of individuals. Findings Under these institutions begetting the expectation of an employee-centric corporate stance, employee-centric signals might both increase institutional legitimacy and have performative effects inspiring judicious employee behavior. Originality/value Certain institutions exert pressure on firms to portray an employee-centric stance, and firms might benefit from quenching these institutional pressures by sending employee-centric signals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International journal of organizational analysis
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-12-2025-6277
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are claims to “put people first” associated with operational efficiency? The moderating role of institutional alignment

Juan I. Sánchez, Yasmina Lazrak, Ivan Pineda, Carolina Gomez et al.
International journal of organizational analysis
Management and Organizational Studies
article

Are claims to “put people first” associated with operational efficiency? The moderating role of institutional alignment

Juan I. Sánchez, Yasmina Lazrak, Ivan Pineda, Carolina Gomez, Luis A. Perez-Batres
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to draw on signaling and informal institutions theories to hypothesize that the employee-centric signals emitted by corporations do not aim at meeting solely the expectations of prospective and current employees but also the institutional pressures that constraint and influence a firm’s action and choice. Design/methodology/approach In support of these predictions, the association between the visibility of employee-centric signals in the corporate websites of 282 Fortune 500 firms and measures of operational performance like Return on Sales and annual gains in Earnings per Share were strongest among firms operating in service industries as well as among firms employing large numbers of individuals. Findings Under these institutions begetting the expectation of an employee-centric corporate stance, employee-centric signals might both increase institutional legitimacy and have performative effects inspiring judicious employee behavior. Originality/value Certain institutions exert pressure on firms to portray an employee-centric stance, and firms might benefit from quenching these institutional pressures by sending employee-centric signals.

International journal of organizational analysis
Texas A&M International University (US), East Carolina University (US), Florida International University (US), Tecnológico de Monterrey (MX)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.