Citizenship Education in Engineering Degree Programs: An Analysis of the Academic Literature

Citizenship education in engineering programs has become a topic of growing concern due to the social, environmental, and technological impacts of engineers’ professional practice. However, there is a lack of systematized information about trends and gaps in the academic literature in this area, which hinders the work of researchers, educators, and academic administrators. Therefore, this study examined the academic literature of the last thirty years (1996–2025) in four major scientific databases (WoS Core Collection, Scopus, SciELO, and Dialnet Plus). A systematic review was conducted using the PRISMA method, which allowed the selection of the articles (n = 74). These articles were then examined through qualitative thematic analysis. Additionally, descriptive frequencies of the corpus were identified, allowing for more precise contextualization. The results show a growing, albeit concentrated, field amidst an incipient transition from a dominant individualistic approach to a critical-democratic one. Furthermore, several significant gaps in the literature were identified, pointing to new research directions. Finally, the implications of these results for engineering schools are presented.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16081317
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Citizenship Education in Engineering Degree Programs: An Analysis of the Academic Literature

Juan José Salinas Valdés, Cristian Orellana-Fonseca, Delfín Ortega Sánchez, Katherine López Jiménez et al.
Education Sciences
Career Development and Diversity
article

Citizenship Education in Engineering Degree Programs: An Analysis of the Academic Literature

Juan José Salinas Valdés, Cristian Orellana-Fonseca, Delfín Ortega Sánchez, Katherine López Jiménez, Marlys Campos-Campos
article en

Abstract

Citizenship education in engineering programs has become a topic of growing concern due to the social, environmental, and technological impacts of engineers’ professional practice. However, there is a lack of systematized information about trends and gaps in the academic literature in this area, which hinders the work of researchers, educators, and academic administrators. Therefore, this study examined the academic literature of the last thirty years (1996–2025) in four major scientific databases (WoS Core Collection, Scopus, SciELO, and Dialnet Plus). A systematic review was conducted using the PRISMA method, which allowed the selection of the articles (n = 74). These articles were then examined through qualitative thematic analysis. Additionally, descriptive frequencies of the corpus were identified, allowing for more precise contextualization. The results show a growing, albeit concentrated, field amidst an incipient transition from a dominant individualistic approach to a critical-democratic one. Furthermore, several significant gaps in the literature were identified, pointing to new research directions. Finally, the implications of these results for engineering schools are presented.

Education SciencesVol. 16(8)
Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity (CL), Metropolitan University of Technology (CL), University of Bío-Bío (CL), Universidad de Los Lagos (CL), Universidad de Burgos (ES), Universidad de Málaga (ES)
Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Career Development and Diversity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.