Prevalence and severity of nomophobia among university students in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq

Nomophobia—short for “no mobile phone phobia”—is an emerging psychological phenomenon characterized by fear or anxiety associated with being without access to a mobile phone. Evidence regarding nomophobia among university students in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq remains limited. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and severity of nomophobia among undergraduate students and to examine differences in nomophobia scores across selected demographic and academic characteristics. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 362 undergraduate students at Koya University, Kurdistan Region of Iraq, using convenience sampling. Data were collected over a nine-month period, from February to November 2024, during the 2023–2024 academic year. Data were gathered using the validated Nomophobia Questionnaire (NMP-Q), a 20-item instrument assessing four dimensions: not being able to access information, giving up convenience, not being able to communicate, and losing connectedness. Responses were recorded on a seven-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent-samples t -tests, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Welch’s ANOVA when the homogeneity-of-variance assumption was violated, and Tukey’s post hoc test where appropriate. Effect sizes were reported using Cohen’s d and eta-squared (η²). The mean overall nomophobia score was 87.58 (SD = 24.48), which falls within the moderate range of the NMP-Q classification. Most students experienced moderate (51.7%) or severe (34.5%) nomophobia, whereas mild (13.0%) and absent (0.8%) levels were less common. No statistically significant differences in nomophobia scores were observed according to gender, academic discipline, academic year, or place of residence. A statistically significant difference was observed across the six academic faculties, F (5, 356) = 4.071, p = 0.001, η² = 0.054. Engineering students and physical education and sport sciences students had significantly higher mean nomophobia scores than humanities and social sciences students. Nomophobia was common among the undergraduate students included in this study, with most participants experiencing moderate or severe levels. Significant differences in nomophobia scores were observed across academic faculties, whereas no statistically significant differences were found according to gender, academic discipline, academic year, or place of residence. These findings support the importance of promoting digital well-being and responsible smartphone use within university settings while recognizing the limitations of a single-university, cross-sectional study. Further multicenter and longitudinal studies incorporating behavioral and psychological factors are recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-05396-3
Primary Topic
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence and severity of nomophobia among university students in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq

Kochr Ali Mahmood, Paiz Saber, Khalid Mustafa, Ardalan Abdulla
BMC Psychology
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
article

Prevalence and severity of nomophobia among university students in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq

Kochr Ali Mahmood, Paiz Saber, Khalid Mustafa, Ardalan Abdulla
article en

Abstract

Nomophobia—short for “no mobile phone phobia”—is an emerging psychological phenomenon characterized by fear or anxiety associated with being without access to a mobile phone. Evidence regarding nomophobia among university students in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq remains limited. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and severity of nomophobia among undergraduate students and to examine differences in nomophobia scores across selected demographic and academic characteristics. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 362 undergraduate students at Koya University, Kurdistan Region of Iraq, using convenience sampling. Data were collected over a nine-month period, from February to November 2024, during the 2023–2024 academic year. Data were gathered using the validated Nomophobia Questionnaire (NMP-Q), a 20-item instrument assessing four dimensions: not being able to access information, giving up convenience, not being able to communicate, and losing connectedness. Responses were recorded on a seven-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent-samples t -tests, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Welch’s ANOVA when the homogeneity-of-variance assumption was violated, and Tukey’s post hoc test where appropriate. Effect sizes were reported using Cohen’s d and eta-squared (η²). The mean overall nomophobia score was 87.58 (SD = 24.48), which falls within the moderate range of the NMP-Q classification. Most students experienced moderate (51.7%) or severe (34.5%) nomophobia, whereas mild (13.0%) and absent (0.8%) levels were less common. No statistically significant differences in nomophobia scores were observed according to gender, academic discipline, academic year, or place of residence. A statistically significant difference was observed across the six academic faculties, F (5, 356) = 4.071, p = 0.001, η² = 0.054. Engineering students and physical education and sport sciences students had significantly higher mean nomophobia scores than humanities and social sciences students. Nomophobia was common among the undergraduate students included in this study, with most participants experiencing moderate or severe levels. Significant differences in nomophobia scores were observed across academic faculties, whereas no statistically significant differences were found according to gender, academic discipline, academic year, or place of residence. These findings support the importance of promoting digital well-being and responsible smartphone use within university settings while recognizing the limitations of a single-university, cross-sectional study. Further multicenter and longitudinal studies incorporating behavioral and psychological factors are recommended.

BMC Psychology
Knowledge University (IQ), Koya University (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.