Determinants of survival after failure of frontline venetoclax plus hypomethylating agent therapy in 356 patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia

Venetoclax (Ven) in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMA) has become the standard frontline therapy for elderly or unfit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (ND-AML). Despite impressive initial response rates demonstrated in the pivotal phase III VIALE-A trial, disease progression or relapse occurred in 42% of patients receiving Ven plus azacytidine [ 1 ]. Long-term follow-up of VIALE-A (median 43.2 months) confirmed a median OS of 14.7 months with Ven-azacitidine versus 9.6 months with placebo-azacitidine (HR 0.58; p < 0.001), and a 24-month OS rate of 37.5%. Nonetheless, most patients eventually experienced treatment failure highlighting the need for more effective therapeutic strategies [ 2 ]. Prior reports characterizing outcomes after frontline Ven+HMA failure have documented a dismal median overall survival (OS) of 2.4 months, with particularly poor outcomes in patients who did not receive salvage therapy [ 3 ]. A recent European real-world cohort of 67 patients similarly reported a median OS of 2.3 months following Ven-HMA failure, with only 30% of patients eligible to receive salvage therapy and a salvage overall response rate of 23%. Notably, no difference in OS was observed between patients who received salvage treatment and those who did not (2.2 vs. 4 months; p = 0.22), further reflecting the dismal outcomes in this setting and highlighting significant disparities in treatment accessibility across healthcare systems [ 4 ]. Another study demonstrated that survival following treatment failure was inferior in patients receiving frontline Ven-HMA compared with those treated with upfront intensive chemotherapy [ 3 ]. In our previously published single-institution experience of 71 ND-AML patients with Ven+HMA failure, TP53 , K/NRAS , and ASXL1 mutations emerged as independent predictors of inferior survival; however, the small sample size, limited salvage therapy data, and molecular profiling at failure which was available in only 18 patients restricted broader applicability [ 5 ]. Herein, we report the largest real-world cohort of 356 ND-AML patients with frontline Ven+HMA failure, characterizing the molecular landscape through paired next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 137 patients, and defining outcomes following salvage therapy in 170 patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood Cancer Journal
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-026-01612-w
Primary Topic
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determinants of survival after failure of frontline venetoclax plus hypomethylating agent therapy in 356 patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia

Naseema Gangat, Antoine N. Saliba, Aref Al‐Kali, Abhishek Avinash Mangaonkar et al.
Blood Cancer Journal
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
article

Determinants of survival after failure of frontline venetoclax plus hypomethylating agent therapy in 356 patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia

Naseema Gangat, Antoine N. Saliba, Aref Al‐Kali, Abhishek Avinash Mangaonkar, Ayalew Tefferi, Mithun Vinod Shah, James M. Foran, Hassan B. Alkhateeb, Momna Warraich, Mrinal M. Patnaik, Kristen Beth McCullough, Talha Badar, Kebede H. Begna, William J. Hogan, Mahnoor Fatima, Cecilia Arana Yi, Jeanne Palmer, Animesh Pardanani, Mark R. Litzow, Sudhesh Kumar
article en

Abstract

Venetoclax (Ven) in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMA) has become the standard frontline therapy for elderly or unfit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (ND-AML). Despite impressive initial response rates demonstrated in the pivotal phase III VIALE-A trial, disease progression or relapse occurred in 42% of patients receiving Ven plus azacytidine [ 1 ]. Long-term follow-up of VIALE-A (median 43.2 months) confirmed a median OS of 14.7 months with Ven-azacitidine versus 9.6 months with placebo-azacitidine (HR 0.58; p < 0.001), and a 24-month OS rate of 37.5%. Nonetheless, most patients eventually experienced treatment failure highlighting the need for more effective therapeutic strategies [ 2 ]. Prior reports characterizing outcomes after frontline Ven+HMA failure have documented a dismal median overall survival (OS) of 2.4 months, with particularly poor outcomes in patients who did not receive salvage therapy [ 3 ]. A recent European real-world cohort of 67 patients similarly reported a median OS of 2.3 months following Ven-HMA failure, with only 30% of patients eligible to receive salvage therapy and a salvage overall response rate of 23%. Notably, no difference in OS was observed between patients who received salvage treatment and those who did not (2.2 vs. 4 months; p = 0.22), further reflecting the dismal outcomes in this setting and highlighting significant disparities in treatment accessibility across healthcare systems [ 4 ]. Another study demonstrated that survival following treatment failure was inferior in patients receiving frontline Ven-HMA compared with those treated with upfront intensive chemotherapy [ 3 ]. In our previously published single-institution experience of 71 ND-AML patients with Ven+HMA failure, TP53 , K/NRAS , and ASXL1 mutations emerged as independent predictors of inferior survival; however, the small sample size, limited salvage therapy data, and molecular profiling at failure which was available in only 18 patients restricted broader applicability [ 5 ]. Herein, we report the largest real-world cohort of 356 ND-AML patients with frontline Ven+HMA failure, characterizing the molecular landscape through paired next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 137 patients, and defining outcomes following salvage therapy in 170 patients.

Blood Cancer JournalVol. 16(1)
Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.