Territorial governance and political centralisation in the nineteenth-century Zulu Kingdom

This study examines how the Zulu Kingdom, under various monarchs, constructed territorial power and a geographical order within southeast Africa in the nineteenth century. It moves beyond typical military and historical interpretations of the Zulu by investigating territorial politics and territorial organisation’s effects on the monarch’s ability to integrate a previously autonomous range of chiefdoms into a network of macro- and micro-scale territorial rule. The use of oral history, archival materials and existing literature on the matter allows the author to analyse aspects, such as the impact of the amabutho institution (military and labour groups), the formation of royal homesteads called izigodlo (administrative centres and fortresses) and the transformation of powers of amakhosi (hereditary chiefs). It becomes clear from the analysis that although King Shaka developed an effective system of centralised governance, mostly over land, labour and movement, Zululand was a highly complicated territory characterised by territorialisation within the context of a segmental lineage society together with peripheral incorporation. It demonstrates how precolonial institutions produced distinctive forms of territorial governance, networked sovereignty and spatially differentiated authority.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Territory Politics Governance
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2026.2711664
Primary Topic
Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Territorial governance and political centralisation in the nineteenth-century Zulu Kingdom

Mthandeni Patric Mbatha
Territory Politics Governance
Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
article

Territorial governance and political centralisation in the nineteenth-century Zulu Kingdom

Mthandeni Patric Mbatha
article en

Abstract

This study examines how the Zulu Kingdom, under various monarchs, constructed territorial power and a geographical order within southeast Africa in the nineteenth century. It moves beyond typical military and historical interpretations of the Zulu by investigating territorial politics and territorial organisation’s effects on the monarch’s ability to integrate a previously autonomous range of chiefdoms into a network of macro- and micro-scale territorial rule. The use of oral history, archival materials and existing literature on the matter allows the author to analyse aspects, such as the impact of the amabutho institution (military and labour groups), the formation of royal homesteads called izigodlo (administrative centres and fortresses) and the transformation of powers of amakhosi (hereditary chiefs). It becomes clear from the analysis that although King Shaka developed an effective system of centralised governance, mostly over land, labour and movement, Zululand was a highly complicated territory characterised by territorialisation within the context of a segmental lineage society together with peripheral incorporation. It demonstrates how precolonial institutions produced distinctive forms of territorial governance, networked sovereignty and spatially differentiated authority.

Territory Politics Governance
University of Zululand (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Territorial governance and political centralisation in the nineteenth-century Zulu Kingdom — Mthandeni Patric Mbatha · Territory Politics Governance (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS