Sex Does Matter! The Influence of Sex on Outcomes of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)

Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) produces heterogeneous outcomes across cognitive, behavioural, and clinical studies. Sex-related differences may contribute to this variability. Objective: This narrative review examined whether and how sex moderates tDCS outcomes across behavioural, physiological, clinical, and modelling studies and considered potential underlying mechanisms. Materials and Methods: A structured literature search identified studies examining sex, or variables reported by the original authors as gender but operationalised through female–male group comparisons, as moderators of tDCS outcomes. After screening, 41 studies met the inclusion criteria, and 6 additional studies were identified through citation searching, yielding 47 studies. Because of substantial heterogeneity in populations, protocols, and outcomes, findings were synthesised narratively. Results: Sex-related effects were common but highly context-dependent, varying by montage, cortical target, stimulation intensity, reference placement, and outcome domain. They often emerged as interaction effects rather than main effects and were most apparent during demanding tasks, later learning phases, or delayed after-effects. Computational models indicated that identical stimulation settings may produce different intracranial electric fields in women and men because of anatomical differences. Hormonal and endocrine states, particularly in females, may further modify or amplify these effects. Sensation, tolerability, and blinding may also contribute under higher-intensity protocols but do not fully explain sex-contingent outcomes. Conclusions: Sex influences tDCS outcomes through interacting anatomical, hormonal, and task-related mechanisms rather than in a uniform manner. Future studies should treat sex as a mechanistically relevant moderator, incorporate dose- and hormone-aware designs, and use adequately powered analyses to improve reproducibility and support individualised neuromodulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cells
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15161474
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex Does Matter! The Influence of Sex on Outcomes of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)

Mirela Niedzielska, Aleksandra Kładna, James Chmiel, Marta Stępień-Słodkowska
Cells
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Sex Does Matter! The Influence of Sex on Outcomes of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)

Mirela Niedzielska, Aleksandra Kładna, James Chmiel, Marta Stępień-Słodkowska
article en

Abstract

Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) produces heterogeneous outcomes across cognitive, behavioural, and clinical studies. Sex-related differences may contribute to this variability. Objective: This narrative review examined whether and how sex moderates tDCS outcomes across behavioural, physiological, clinical, and modelling studies and considered potential underlying mechanisms. Materials and Methods: A structured literature search identified studies examining sex, or variables reported by the original authors as gender but operationalised through female–male group comparisons, as moderators of tDCS outcomes. After screening, 41 studies met the inclusion criteria, and 6 additional studies were identified through citation searching, yielding 47 studies. Because of substantial heterogeneity in populations, protocols, and outcomes, findings were synthesised narratively. Results: Sex-related effects were common but highly context-dependent, varying by montage, cortical target, stimulation intensity, reference placement, and outcome domain. They often emerged as interaction effects rather than main effects and were most apparent during demanding tasks, later learning phases, or delayed after-effects. Computational models indicated that identical stimulation settings may produce different intracranial electric fields in women and men because of anatomical differences. Hormonal and endocrine states, particularly in females, may further modify or amplify these effects. Sensation, tolerability, and blinding may also contribute under higher-intensity protocols but do not fully explain sex-contingent outcomes. Conclusions: Sex influences tDCS outcomes through interacting anatomical, hormonal, and task-related mechanisms rather than in a uniform manner. Future studies should treat sex as a mechanistically relevant moderator, incorporate dose- and hormone-aware designs, and use adequately powered analyses to improve reproducibility and support individualised neuromodulation.

CellsVol. 15(16)
University of Szczecin (PL), Pomeranian Medical University (PL)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.