Regional growth kinetics of geographic atrophy in age‐related macular degeneration with and without fovea‐sparing

PURPOSE: Fovea-sparing geographic atrophy (GA) patients retain near-normal central vision. To better understand GA progression in relation to the fovea, we performed a semi-automated image analysis of regional atrophy growth in a long-term GA natural-history cohort. METHODS: Prospective-observational, single-centre-study (02/2013-07/2025) at the Division of Eye and Vision, Karolinska Institutet/St. Erik Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Longitudinal square-root-transformed GA area and distance-growth rates [mm/year] in all retinal quadrants were calculated from fundus autofluorescence images. Eyes were stratified based on best-corrected visual acuity: fovea-sparing (≥65 ETDRS) and fovea-involving (<65 ETDRS). RESULTS: 65 eyes (65 patients) presented fovea-sparing and 91 eyes (91 patients) fovea-involving. Median follow-up was 18 months (range: 5-125). The fovea-involving group decreased in BCVA (Wilcoxon, p < 0.001). Total area growth was faster for fovea-sparing than fovea-involving lesions: 0.34 vs. 0.26 (Mann-Whitney U, p = 0.0019). The same was true for the superior, inferior, and temporal quadrants (Mann-Whitney U, all p < 0.0472). Fovea-sparing lesions showed slower distance growth towards the fovea than outwards in all quadrants: superior 0.09 vs. 0.21; nasal 0.08 vs. 0.18; inferior 0.06 vs. 0.17; temporal 0.09 vs. 0.20 (Wilcoxon, all p < 0.001). Lesions closer to the fovea (≤500 μm) at baseline showed decreased regional growth towards the fovea. Outwards growth was not related to lesion location. CONCLUSIONS: In this longitudinal cohort, fovea-sparing lesions showed faster total and regional growth than fovea-involving lesions, mainly caused by a faster outward expansion component. Location 500 μm or closer to the fovea resulted in slower growth, which supports a foveal self-protecting mechanism. These are relevant findings for patients with fovea-sparing lesions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Ophthalmologica
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.70229
Primary Topic
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regional growth kinetics of geographic atrophy in age‐related macular degeneration with and without fovea‐sparing

Laurence Quérat, Anders Kvanta, Alberto Domínguez‐Vicent, Filippo Locri et al.
Acta Ophthalmologica
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
article

Regional growth kinetics of geographic atrophy in age‐related macular degeneration with and without fovea‐sparing

Laurence Quérat, Anders Kvanta, Alberto Domínguez‐Vicent, Filippo Locri, Daniel Rudolf Muth, Goran Petrovski, Sandrine A. Zweifel, Abinaya P. Venkataraman, Pete A. Williams
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Fovea-sparing geographic atrophy (GA) patients retain near-normal central vision. To better understand GA progression in relation to the fovea, we performed a semi-automated image analysis of regional atrophy growth in a long-term GA natural-history cohort. METHODS: Prospective-observational, single-centre-study (02/2013-07/2025) at the Division of Eye and Vision, Karolinska Institutet/St. Erik Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Longitudinal square-root-transformed GA area and distance-growth rates [mm/year] in all retinal quadrants were calculated from fundus autofluorescence images. Eyes were stratified based on best-corrected visual acuity: fovea-sparing (≥65 ETDRS) and fovea-involving (<65 ETDRS). RESULTS: 65 eyes (65 patients) presented fovea-sparing and 91 eyes (91 patients) fovea-involving. Median follow-up was 18 months (range: 5-125). The fovea-involving group decreased in BCVA (Wilcoxon, p < 0.001). Total area growth was faster for fovea-sparing than fovea-involving lesions: 0.34 vs. 0.26 (Mann-Whitney U, p = 0.0019). The same was true for the superior, inferior, and temporal quadrants (Mann-Whitney U, all p < 0.0472). Fovea-sparing lesions showed slower distance growth towards the fovea than outwards in all quadrants: superior 0.09 vs. 0.21; nasal 0.08 vs. 0.18; inferior 0.06 vs. 0.17; temporal 0.09 vs. 0.20 (Wilcoxon, all p < 0.001). Lesions closer to the fovea (≤500 μm) at baseline showed decreased regional growth towards the fovea. Outwards growth was not related to lesion location. CONCLUSIONS: In this longitudinal cohort, fovea-sparing lesions showed faster total and regional growth than fovea-involving lesions, mainly caused by a faster outward expansion component. Location 500 μm or closer to the fovea resulted in slower growth, which supports a foveal self-protecting mechanism. These are relevant findings for patients with fovea-sparing lesions.

Acta Ophthalmologica
Oslo University Hospital (NO), University of Oslo (NO), University of Zurich (CH), University "St. Kliment Ohridski" - Bitola (MK), Karolinska Institutet (SE), University Hospital of Zurich (CH), Centre for Eye Research Australia (AU), S:t Eriks Ögonsjukhus (SE), University of Split (HR)
Ögonfonden
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.