Smoking-Stratified Signal Decomposition and Feature Selection for Never-Smoker Cancer Classification in a Combined Lung–Breast Metabolomics Cohort

Metabolomic cancer classifiers trained on mixed-smoking cohorts may embed tobacco exposure signal within their predictions, degrading performance in never-smokers, a population in which lung adenocarcinoma is frequently diagnosed. We developed a two-stage framework that (i) decomposes a shared 129-metabolite panel from a combined lung–breast cancer cohort (n=1038) into cancer-specific (Signal C), smoking-specific (Signal S), and shared (Signal S∩C) components using two-way analysis of variance with Benjamini–Hochberg correction, and (ii) applies multiple feature-selection strategies to identify the minimal Signal C subset that surpasses the all-metabolite baseline for never-smoker cancer detection. Two-way ANOVA partitioned 54 of 129 metabolites as cancer-specific (Signal C) and 57 as smoking-specific (Signal S), suggesting that nearly half of the shared panel is influenced by tobacco exposure. A model of 19 Signal C metabolites, selected by composite rank aggregation across four feature-selection methods and trained with gradient-boosted trees, achieved a never-smoker area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.907 on pooled out-of-fold predictions (0.910 as a mean across folds) against an all-metabolite baseline of 0.895, using 85% fewer metabolite measurements. The signal decomposition is a reproducible and interpretable way to identify metabolites whose case–control differences are not attributable to tobacco exposure, and it permits a substantial reduction in panel size.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27167350
Primary Topic
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Smoking-Stratified Signal Decomposition and Feature Selection for Never-Smoker Cancer Classification in a Combined Lung–Breast Metabolomics Cohort

Paramjit S. Tappia, Maria Vaida, Guoyu Huang, Jean-François Haince et al.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
article

Smoking-Stratified Signal Decomposition and Feature Selection for Never-Smoker Cancer Classification in a Combined Lung–Breast Metabolomics Cohort

Paramjit S. Tappia, Maria Vaida, Guoyu Huang, Jean-François Haince, Bram Ramjiawan, Bharadwaj Popuri, Rashid A. Bux
article en

Abstract

Metabolomic cancer classifiers trained on mixed-smoking cohorts may embed tobacco exposure signal within their predictions, degrading performance in never-smokers, a population in which lung adenocarcinoma is frequently diagnosed. We developed a two-stage framework that (i) decomposes a shared 129-metabolite panel from a combined lung–breast cancer cohort (n=1038) into cancer-specific (Signal C), smoking-specific (Signal S), and shared (Signal S∩C) components using two-way analysis of variance with Benjamini–Hochberg correction, and (ii) applies multiple feature-selection strategies to identify the minimal Signal C subset that surpasses the all-metabolite baseline for never-smoker cancer detection. Two-way ANOVA partitioned 54 of 129 metabolites as cancer-specific (Signal C) and 57 as smoking-specific (Signal S), suggesting that nearly half of the shared panel is influenced by tobacco exposure. A model of 19 Signal C metabolites, selected by composite rank aggregation across four feature-selection methods and trained with gradient-boosted trees, achieved a never-smoker area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.907 on pooled out-of-fold predictions (0.910 as a mean across folds) against an all-metabolite baseline of 0.895, using 85% fewer metabolite measurements. The signal decomposition is a reproducible and interpretable way to identify metabolites whose case–control differences are not attributable to tobacco exposure, and it permits a substantial reduction in panel size.

International Journal of Molecular SciencesVol. 27(16)
Harrisburg University of Science and Technology (US), Hummingbird Diagnostics (Germany) (DE), Q2 Solutions (United Kingdom) (GB), University of Manitoba (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.