Generative AI, autonomy and healthy ageing: a reflexive thematic analysis of urban older adults through an integrated SST–SDT lens

Purpose This paper aims to offer a worked methodological demonstration of an integrated socioemotional selectivity theory (SST)–self-determination theory (SDT) reflexive thematic analysis (RTA), examining how urban, community-dwelling older adults in India are illustrated as using and emotionally experiencing generative AI and how this relates to autonomy, competence, relatedness and healthy ageing. Design/methodology/approach An RTA, organised using a Gioia-style structure, was conducted on an illustrative data set of 16 urban older adults (aged 61–83, mean 70.6) across 10 Indian cities: 5 full transcripts and 11 condensed summaries. As the data set was constructed for teaching purposes rather than collected under ethics-approved fieldwork, findings are a hypothesis-generating exercise rather than generalisable evidence. Findings Six aggregate dimensions were derived: everyday instrumental and cognitive integration; emotional relief primarily through reduction of uncertainty rather than direct companionship; differentiated relational meaning ranging from simulated companionship to explicitly non-relational, intellectual partnership; autonomy and competence gained through self-directed problem-solving; a near-universal positioning of AI as bounded against human relationships; and countercurrents of privacy unease, calibrated trust, literacy barriers and fear of overdependence. The integrated SST–SDT chain fit unevenly: several accounts were better explained by an informational, cognitive-appraisal pathway than an emotional one, and relatedness, unlike autonomy and competence, was not consistently reported. Originality/value This paper provides a transparent, reflexive worked example of applying an integrated SST–SDT framework with Gioia-structured RTA to a novel, under-researched population, and specifies what a genuine empirical study in this domain would require.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Working with Older People
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/wwop-07-2026-0084
Primary Topic
Aging and Gerontology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative AI, autonomy and healthy ageing: a reflexive thematic analysis of urban older adults through an integrated SST–SDT lens

Vinod Sharma, Saikat Deb, Aniket Godse, Avishek Ghosal
Working with Older People
Aging and Gerontology Research
article

Generative AI, autonomy and healthy ageing: a reflexive thematic analysis of urban older adults through an integrated SST–SDT lens

Vinod Sharma, Saikat Deb, Aniket Godse, Avishek Ghosal
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to offer a worked methodological demonstration of an integrated socioemotional selectivity theory (SST)–self-determination theory (SDT) reflexive thematic analysis (RTA), examining how urban, community-dwelling older adults in India are illustrated as using and emotionally experiencing generative AI and how this relates to autonomy, competence, relatedness and healthy ageing. Design/methodology/approach An RTA, organised using a Gioia-style structure, was conducted on an illustrative data set of 16 urban older adults (aged 61–83, mean 70.6) across 10 Indian cities: 5 full transcripts and 11 condensed summaries. As the data set was constructed for teaching purposes rather than collected under ethics-approved fieldwork, findings are a hypothesis-generating exercise rather than generalisable evidence. Findings Six aggregate dimensions were derived: everyday instrumental and cognitive integration; emotional relief primarily through reduction of uncertainty rather than direct companionship; differentiated relational meaning ranging from simulated companionship to explicitly non-relational, intellectual partnership; autonomy and competence gained through self-directed problem-solving; a near-universal positioning of AI as bounded against human relationships; and countercurrents of privacy unease, calibrated trust, literacy barriers and fear of overdependence. The integrated SST–SDT chain fit unevenly: several accounts were better explained by an informational, cognitive-appraisal pathway than an emotional one, and relatedness, unlike autonomy and competence, was not consistently reported. Originality/value This paper provides a transparent, reflexive worked example of applying an integrated SST–SDT framework with Gioia-structured RTA to a novel, under-researched population, and specifies what a genuine empirical study in this domain would require.

Working with Older People
Symbiosis International University (IN), Jaipuria Institute of Management (IN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Aging and Gerontology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.