Interpreting Bayesian Trials—Rigor and Avoiding Misconception

This Viewpoint highlights several considerations important for stakeholders and reviewers to understand regarding the design, evaluation, and interpretation of trials using bayesian analyses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2026.3557
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interpreting Bayesian Trials—Rigor and Avoiding Misconception

John M. VanBuren, T. Charles Casper, Anna McGlothlin
Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Interpreting Bayesian Trials—Rigor and Avoiding Misconception

John M. VanBuren, T. Charles Casper, Anna McGlothlin
article en

Abstract

This Viewpoint highlights several considerations important for stakeholders and reviewers to understand regarding the design, evaluation, and interpretation of trials using bayesian analyses.

Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), University of Utah (US), Berry & Associates (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
DOISourceOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.