Infrastructure Project Finance and Investment Management: Bankability, Risk Allocation, and Capital Recycling

ABSTRACT This paper surveys infrastructure project finance and investment management through the organizing concept of bankability. It explains how long‐lived, capital‐intensive and politically exposed infrastructure assets are transformed into financeable projects and investable claims through special‐purpose vehicles, contractual risk allocation, cash‐flow controls, public support, credit structuring and capital recycling. The survey connects project‐finance practice with economic questions in incomplete contracting, public‐private risk sharing, financial intermediation, institutional investment, energy transition and ESG risk management. It argues that infrastructure finance is best understood not as a simple public‐versus‐private funding choice, but as a system for allocating construction, revenue, political, operating, currency, refinancing and ESG risks to parties able to manage, absorb or price them. The paper concludes with a research and practitioner agenda on bankability measurement, debt capacity, secondary markets, blended finance, and climate‐resilient infrastructure investment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economic Surveys
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.70150
Primary Topic
Public-Private Partnership Projects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Infrastructure Project Finance and Investment Management: Bankability, Risk Allocation, and Capital Recycling

Ziming Meng
Journal of Economic Surveys
Public-Private Partnership Projects
article

Infrastructure Project Finance and Investment Management: Bankability, Risk Allocation, and Capital Recycling

Ziming Meng
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper surveys infrastructure project finance and investment management through the organizing concept of bankability. It explains how long‐lived, capital‐intensive and politically exposed infrastructure assets are transformed into financeable projects and investable claims through special‐purpose vehicles, contractual risk allocation, cash‐flow controls, public support, credit structuring and capital recycling. The survey connects project‐finance practice with economic questions in incomplete contracting, public‐private risk sharing, financial intermediation, institutional investment, energy transition and ESG risk management. It argues that infrastructure finance is best understood not as a simple public‐versus‐private funding choice, but as a system for allocating construction, revenue, political, operating, currency, refinancing and ESG risks to parties able to manage, absorb or price them. The paper concludes with a research and practitioner agenda on bankability measurement, debt capacity, secondary markets, blended finance, and climate‐resilient infrastructure investment.

Journal of Economic Surveys
Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales du Nord (FR)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Public-Private Partnership Projects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.