Under His Eye: Politics of Survival through Complicity and Resistance - The Women of Gilead

This paper explores Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale and The Testaments through a dual lens of intersectional feminism and deconstruction. My intention is the analysis of a woman’s navigation through the theocratic patriarchal society of Gilead, imposing systemic op-pression. Though current scholarship leans towards a traditional feminist interpretation, this paper will reflect a more complex explanation of the internal caste system within Gilead’s private female sphere. Placing an emphasis on the main female roles, Handmaids, Wives, and Aunts, I will demonstrate that the fractured power structure in Gilead chose to weaponize women through the discourse of biblical precedent and piety. I will draw from theorists, including Michael Foucault, Kimberle Crenshaw, Judith Butler, as well as various others inclined to confirm the destructive influence of power, compounded by a discourse of subjugation. Adopting the approach of close reading, my research will present the paradoxical relationship of survival and complicity; and comparatively, of resistance and ac-ceptance. As Atwood presents, a woman’s complicity does not discredit their agency. Both novels, The Handmaid’s Tale and The Testaments highlight how complicity is not acceptance of oppres-sion, nor is it the absence of resistance. Gilead’s structural environment complicates definitive ex-amples of such independent labels. My research will contribute to feminist criticism by providing the gap found in scholarship, while also illuminating Atwood’s choice to emphasize extreme ideological adoption and its impact on society. As Atwood considers her two-part novel a work of speculative fiction, rather than a dystopia, she sheds light on the paradox of religion and power, how survival grows from rebel-lious desires, and how blurry complicity can be.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
SNHU Academic Archive (Southern New Hampshire University)
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.82267/tind.519375
Primary Topic
Themes in Literature Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Under His Eye: Politics of Survival through Complicity and Resistance - The Women of Gilead

Christy Michelle Gonzalez
SNHU Academic Archive (Southern New Hampshire University)
Themes in Literature Analysis
article

Under His Eye: Politics of Survival through Complicity and Resistance - The Women of Gilead

Christy Michelle Gonzalez
article en

Abstract

This paper explores Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale and The Testaments through a dual lens of intersectional feminism and deconstruction. My intention is the analysis of a woman’s navigation through the theocratic patriarchal society of Gilead, imposing systemic op-pression. Though current scholarship leans towards a traditional feminist interpretation, this paper will reflect a more complex explanation of the internal caste system within Gilead’s private female sphere. Placing an emphasis on the main female roles, Handmaids, Wives, and Aunts, I will demonstrate that the fractured power structure in Gilead chose to weaponize women through the discourse of biblical precedent and piety. I will draw from theorists, including Michael Foucault, Kimberle Crenshaw, Judith Butler, as well as various others inclined to confirm the destructive influence of power, compounded by a discourse of subjugation. Adopting the approach of close reading, my research will present the paradoxical relationship of survival and complicity; and comparatively, of resistance and ac-ceptance. As Atwood presents, a woman’s complicity does not discredit their agency. Both novels, The Handmaid’s Tale and The Testaments highlight how complicity is not acceptance of oppres-sion, nor is it the absence of resistance. Gilead’s structural environment complicates definitive ex-amples of such independent labels. My research will contribute to feminist criticism by providing the gap found in scholarship, while also illuminating Atwood’s choice to emphasize extreme ideological adoption and its impact on society. As Atwood considers her two-part novel a work of speculative fiction, rather than a dystopia, she sheds light on the paradox of religion and power, how survival grows from rebel-lious desires, and how blurry complicity can be.

SNHU Academic Archive (Southern New Hampshire University)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Themes in Literature Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.