Image orientation and contents influence pointing movements on touch sensitive screens: a kinematic analysis

Given the increasing use of touch-screens, the impact of images of objects upon cursor positioning were examined. As objects may present compatible and conflicting cues for movement, we examined the influence of relevant and irrelevant cues on responses when pointing to images on touch-screens. An experiment (N = 24) examined leftwards or rightwards pointing movements to images of large or small cups with handles that could be compatible or incompatible for grasping and were depicted as full or empty. Handle compatibility only benefited response latencies for empty cups, and this effect was reversed for small cups. Kinematic analyses suggested movements were less efficient to images of cups with compatible handles. Aiming points varied with cup size and contents suggesting that handles influenced performance when they presented lower Indices of Difficulty (as per Fitts’ law). Object characteristics can influence screen hot-spots, and this primarily occurs whilst the cursor is in motion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ergonomics
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2026.2715042
Primary Topic
Interactive and Immersive Displays
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Image orientation and contents influence pointing movements on touch sensitive screens: a kinematic analysis

Barry Hughes, Arend W. A. Van Gemmert, James G. Phillips, Alison J. Phillips
Ergonomics
Interactive and Immersive Displays
article

Image orientation and contents influence pointing movements on touch sensitive screens: a kinematic analysis

Barry Hughes, Arend W. A. Van Gemmert, James G. Phillips, Alison J. Phillips
article en

Abstract

Given the increasing use of touch-screens, the impact of images of objects upon cursor positioning were examined. As objects may present compatible and conflicting cues for movement, we examined the influence of relevant and irrelevant cues on responses when pointing to images on touch-screens. An experiment (N = 24) examined leftwards or rightwards pointing movements to images of large or small cups with handles that could be compatible or incompatible for grasping and were depicted as full or empty. Handle compatibility only benefited response latencies for empty cups, and this effect was reversed for small cups. Kinematic analyses suggested movements were less efficient to images of cups with compatible handles. Aiming points varied with cup size and contents suggesting that handles influenced performance when they presented lower Indices of Difficulty (as per Fitts’ law). Object characteristics can influence screen hot-spots, and this primarily occurs whilst the cursor is in motion.

Ergonomics
Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US), University of Auckland (NZ), Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Interactive and Immersive Displays
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.