Designing Inclusive Budgeting Tools: Understanding Financial Behavior and Cultural Differences Among University Students

University students face financial challenges, including unstable income, rising living costs, and limited money-management experience, potentially causing stress, debt, and reduced academic engagement. Digital budgeting tools are often recommended, yet many solutions insufficiently consider students’ diverse financial needs, motivations, and cultural contexts, with little attention to who adopts them and who does not. To explore design opportunities, we examine budgeting-tool use through a mixed-methods study combining 305 survey responses and 13 interviews. Results reveal behavioral differences between users and non-users, shaped by saving goals, spending habits, income structure, and cultural context. Cluster analysis identifies three behavioral profiles associated with financial planning practices, income sources, and repayment behavior. Interviews further show dissatisfaction with existing budgeting applications and expectations beyond functional efficiency, including support for engagement, reflection, and everyday financial understanding. These findings inform more inclusive budgeting tools and highlight the potential of adaptive, AI-supported approaches for better supporting lower-engagement student groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2026.2712661
Primary Topic
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Designing Inclusive Budgeting Tools: Understanding Financial Behavior and Cultural Differences Among University Students

Boxuan Ma, Shin’ichi Konomi, Yinjie Xie
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
article

Designing Inclusive Budgeting Tools: Understanding Financial Behavior and Cultural Differences Among University Students

Boxuan Ma, Shin’ichi Konomi, Yinjie Xie
article en

Abstract

University students face financial challenges, including unstable income, rising living costs, and limited money-management experience, potentially causing stress, debt, and reduced academic engagement. Digital budgeting tools are often recommended, yet many solutions insufficiently consider students’ diverse financial needs, motivations, and cultural contexts, with little attention to who adopts them and who does not. To explore design opportunities, we examine budgeting-tool use through a mixed-methods study combining 305 survey responses and 13 interviews. Results reveal behavioral differences between users and non-users, shaped by saving goals, spending habits, income structure, and cultural context. Cluster analysis identifies three behavioral profiles associated with financial planning practices, income sources, and repayment behavior. Interviews further show dissatisfaction with existing budgeting applications and expectations beyond functional efficiency, including support for engagement, reflection, and everyday financial understanding. These findings inform more inclusive budgeting tools and highlight the potential of adaptive, AI-supported approaches for better supporting lower-engagement student groups.

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Kyushu University (JP)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.