Excitability of Posterior Root Reflex Evoked by Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation is Distinct from H-reflex in the Soleus Muscle: A Pulse Duration Study

Transcutaneous spinal stimulation studies of the lumbosacral posterior root reflex (PRR) have commonly used a 1-ms pulse duration adopted from soleus H-reflex protocols. However, it remains unknown whether the excitability characteristics of the PRR and H-reflex vary with pulse duration. Twelve neurologically intact participants underwent tibial nerve stimulation to evoke soleus M waves and H-reflexes, and lumbosacral transcutaneous spinal stimulation to evoke soleus PRRs. Recruitment curve data were collected across eight pulse durations (50-2,000 µs). Stimulation intensities corresponding to 50% of the maximum H-reflex were used to construct strength-duration curves for each response type. Rheobase and chronaxie were estimated using the Weiss-Lapicque equation. Maximum peak-to-peak amplitudes of the M wave, H-reflex, and PRR did not differ significantly across pulse duration (with increased stimulation intensity at shorter pulse durations). However, when normalized to the maximum M wave, the PRR was 12.3% larger than the H-reflex. The strength-duration curves were well described by a hyperbolic function, with the PRR exhibiting a substantially higher rheobase (50.8 mA) and shorter chronaxie (338 µs) than the H-reflex (6.7 mA; 874 µs) and M wave (12.5 mA; 545 µs). The maximum soleus PRR and H-reflex do not differ across pulse durations from 50 to 2,000 µs, although shorter pulses require higher stimulation intensities. The differences in PRR and H-reflex rheobase and chronaxie values are likely due to specific electrode configurations, tissue properties, and sites of activation. The excitability characteristics of the soleus PRR and H-reflex have implications for selecting stimulators and their parameters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00147.2026
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Excitability of Posterior Root Reflex Evoked by Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation is Distinct from H-reflex in the Soleus Muscle: A Pulse Duration Study

Dobrivoje S. Stokić, Matthias Krenn, Elizabeth A. Gordineer
Journal of Neurophysiology
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Excitability of Posterior Root Reflex Evoked by Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation is Distinct from H-reflex in the Soleus Muscle: A Pulse Duration Study

Dobrivoje S. Stokić, Matthias Krenn, Elizabeth A. Gordineer
article en

Abstract

Transcutaneous spinal stimulation studies of the lumbosacral posterior root reflex (PRR) have commonly used a 1-ms pulse duration adopted from soleus H-reflex protocols. However, it remains unknown whether the excitability characteristics of the PRR and H-reflex vary with pulse duration. Twelve neurologically intact participants underwent tibial nerve stimulation to evoke soleus M waves and H-reflexes, and lumbosacral transcutaneous spinal stimulation to evoke soleus PRRs. Recruitment curve data were collected across eight pulse durations (50-2,000 µs). Stimulation intensities corresponding to 50% of the maximum H-reflex were used to construct strength-duration curves for each response type. Rheobase and chronaxie were estimated using the Weiss-Lapicque equation. Maximum peak-to-peak amplitudes of the M wave, H-reflex, and PRR did not differ significantly across pulse duration (with increased stimulation intensity at shorter pulse durations). However, when normalized to the maximum M wave, the PRR was 12.3% larger than the H-reflex. The strength-duration curves were well described by a hyperbolic function, with the PRR exhibiting a substantially higher rheobase (50.8 mA) and shorter chronaxie (338 µs) than the H-reflex (6.7 mA; 874 µs) and M wave (12.5 mA; 545 µs). The maximum soleus PRR and H-reflex do not differ across pulse durations from 50 to 2,000 µs, although shorter pulses require higher stimulation intensities. The differences in PRR and H-reflex rheobase and chronaxie values are likely due to specific electrode configurations, tissue properties, and sites of activation. The excitability characteristics of the soleus PRR and H-reflex have implications for selecting stimulators and their parameters.

Journal of Neurophysiology
University of Mississippi Medical Center (US), Methodist Rehabilitation Center (US)
Wings for Life, National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.