A tale of two realities: how do policymakers and general practitioners perceive the performance of primary health networks in Australia

BACKGROUND: As the major regional primary health care (PHC) organisations in Australia, Primary Health Networks (PHNs) are expected to coordinate health care for patients and respond to local health needs. To evaluate their success, it is important to examine both policy practitioners' and GPs' perceptions of PHNs' role, structure and performance. METHODS: Thirty-six semi-structured interviews were conducted, including 15 interviews with policy practitioners and 21 interviews with GPs. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed to gain a comprehensive understanding of key stakeholders' perceptions of the performance of PHNs. RESULTS: The interviews with policy practitioners gave rise to three main themes: (1) PHNs enabled federal and state collaboration in PHC; (2) PHNs played an intermediary role in system integration; and (3) further actions were needed to improve the performance of PHNs. Three further main themes were derived from interviews with GPs: (4) PHNs did not engage enough with general practice; (5) GPs preferred the former divisions of General Practice and distrusted PHNs; and (6) PHNs were viewed as a means for the federal health department to recentralise, rather than decentralise, the health system. CONCLUSION: The different sets of themes reflected different perspectives on PHNs' role, structure and performance. Although policy practitioners generally held a positive view over PHNs' role and performance, GPs complained about the lack of engagement from PHNs and demonstrated distrust of PHNs. Given GPs' critical role in the delivery of PHC, their distrust of PHNs limits the success of PHNs in terms of supporting better PHC and improving care coordination. The Australian Federal Government should find ways to mitigate GPs' distrust of Commonwealth-funded regional PHC organisations, including by encouraging improved engagement by PHNs with general practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Primary Health
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/py26111
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A tale of two realities: how do policymakers and general practitioners perceive the performance of primary health networks in Australia

Andrew Podger, Yabo Yan
Australian Journal of Primary Health
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
article

A tale of two realities: how do policymakers and general practitioners perceive the performance of primary health networks in Australia

Andrew Podger, Yabo Yan
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As the major regional primary health care (PHC) organisations in Australia, Primary Health Networks (PHNs) are expected to coordinate health care for patients and respond to local health needs. To evaluate their success, it is important to examine both policy practitioners' and GPs' perceptions of PHNs' role, structure and performance. METHODS: Thirty-six semi-structured interviews were conducted, including 15 interviews with policy practitioners and 21 interviews with GPs. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed to gain a comprehensive understanding of key stakeholders' perceptions of the performance of PHNs. RESULTS: The interviews with policy practitioners gave rise to three main themes: (1) PHNs enabled federal and state collaboration in PHC; (2) PHNs played an intermediary role in system integration; and (3) further actions were needed to improve the performance of PHNs. Three further main themes were derived from interviews with GPs: (4) PHNs did not engage enough with general practice; (5) GPs preferred the former divisions of General Practice and distrusted PHNs; and (6) PHNs were viewed as a means for the federal health department to recentralise, rather than decentralise, the health system. CONCLUSION: The different sets of themes reflected different perspectives on PHNs' role, structure and performance. Although policy practitioners generally held a positive view over PHNs' role and performance, GPs complained about the lack of engagement from PHNs and demonstrated distrust of PHNs. Given GPs' critical role in the delivery of PHC, their distrust of PHNs limits the success of PHNs in terms of supporting better PHC and improving care coordination. The Australian Federal Government should find ways to mitigate GPs' distrust of Commonwealth-funded regional PHC organisations, including by encouraging improved engagement by PHNs with general practice.

Australian Journal of Primary HealthVol. 32(5)
Australian National University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.