Risk-adapted intervals for colorectal cancer screening using fecal immunochemical tests: a modelling study based on the BLITZ cohort

Abstract Background Established screening programs for colorectal cancer (CRC) based on fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) employ fixed screening intervals of either one year or two years for all participants. We aimed to assess the potential design of risk-adapted FIT screening intervals based on quantitative values of the fecal hemoglobin concentration among FIT negative participants. Methods Using COSIMO, a previously validated simulation tool, we compared CRC risks in subgroups with initially negative FIT. Subgroups were stratified by stool hemoglobin levels at screening (< 8 (low), 8-<10 (medium), 10-<17 µg (high) Hb/g stool), a routinely available measure in FIT-based screening programs. Colorectal neoplasia prevalences at model start were informed by 6,661 screening colonoscopy participants in Germany at average CRC risk with negative FIT and available colonoscopy results (BLITZ study). Simulations were run for hypothetical cohorts of 100,000 individuals. Results Of 6,661 FIT-negative participants, 6,016 (90%), 273 (4%), and 372 (6%) were in the low, medium, and high-negative subgroups, respectively. In those low-negative, expected cancer detection rates were 0.17%, 0.30%, 0.42%, 0.53%, and 0.62%, after screening intervals of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively. Cancer detection rates among the small groups of medium- and high-negative patients were up to six times higher and exceeded the expected 2-year detection rates of the low-negative group already after 1 year of follow-up. Conclusions Fecal hemoglobin concentrations among FIT negative participants may be a readily available, highly informative tool for defining risk-adapted annual or biennial FIT screening intervals.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medicine
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-026-05138-7
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk-adapted intervals for colorectal cancer screening using fecal immunochemical tests: a modelling study based on the BLITZ cohort

Thomas Heisser, Teresa Seum, Hermann Brenner, Michael Hoffmeister
BMC Medicine
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Risk-adapted intervals for colorectal cancer screening using fecal immunochemical tests: a modelling study based on the BLITZ cohort

Thomas Heisser, Teresa Seum, Hermann Brenner, Michael Hoffmeister
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Established screening programs for colorectal cancer (CRC) based on fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) employ fixed screening intervals of either one year or two years for all participants. We aimed to assess the potential design of risk-adapted FIT screening intervals based on quantitative values of the fecal hemoglobin concentration among FIT negative participants. Methods Using COSIMO, a previously validated simulation tool, we compared CRC risks in subgroups with initially negative FIT. Subgroups were stratified by stool hemoglobin levels at screening (< 8 (low), 8-<10 (medium), 10-<17 µg (high) Hb/g stool), a routinely available measure in FIT-based screening programs. Colorectal neoplasia prevalences at model start were informed by 6,661 screening colonoscopy participants in Germany at average CRC risk with negative FIT and available colonoscopy results (BLITZ study). Simulations were run for hypothetical cohorts of 100,000 individuals. Results Of 6,661 FIT-negative participants, 6,016 (90%), 273 (4%), and 372 (6%) were in the low, medium, and high-negative subgroups, respectively. In those low-negative, expected cancer detection rates were 0.17%, 0.30%, 0.42%, 0.53%, and 0.62%, after screening intervals of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively. Cancer detection rates among the small groups of medium- and high-negative patients were up to six times higher and exceeded the expected 2-year detection rates of the low-negative group already after 1 year of follow-up. Conclusions Fecal hemoglobin concentrations among FIT negative participants may be a readily available, highly informative tool for defining risk-adapted annual or biennial FIT screening intervals.

BMC MedicineVol. 24(1)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.