An evaluation of a pilot national online peer support service for kidney disease: feasibility, acceptability and perceived benefit

Purpose This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, implementation processes and perceived benefits of a national online peer support pilot for people living with kidney disease. Design/methodology/approach A mixed-methods service evaluation examining feasibility, acceptability, implementation processes and perceived benefits was conducted, structured around the organisations six step service model. Data sources included document review and stakeholder consultation, focus groups with peer support volunteers (n = 8) and service users who had completed the programme (n = 9), interviews/consultation with key organisational personnel (n = 2) and referring healthcare professionals (n = 3). Qualitative data were synthesised thematically within the six steps framework and triangulated with descriptive survey results from service monitoring data, and satisfaction surveys (n = 8). Findings The service was perceived as acceptable and beneficial, with participants reporting perceived improvements in emotional wellbeing practical coping support, and high likelihood of recommending the service. Implementation strengths included a clear recruitment pathway, comprehensive training and reflective supervision and a structured referral–triage–matching process. Key implementation challenges related to optimising promotion and referral flow (beyond hospital settings), improving referral efficiency (e.g. electronic referral) and enhancing matching to service-user preferences to minimise mismatch. Quality assurance processes were in place, with recommendations to strengthen real-time feedback collection and routine outcome monitoring. Originality/value This study provides one of the first implementation-focused evaluations of a national, online kidney peer support model, offering a practical six steps-based blueprint and empirically grounded recommendations to support optimisation, scale-up and sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mental Health and Digital Technologies
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/mhdt-01-2026-0004
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An evaluation of a pilot national online peer support service for kidney disease: feasibility, acceptability and perceived benefit

Daryl Mahon
Mental Health and Digital Technologies
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

An evaluation of a pilot national online peer support service for kidney disease: feasibility, acceptability and perceived benefit

Daryl Mahon
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, implementation processes and perceived benefits of a national online peer support pilot for people living with kidney disease. Design/methodology/approach A mixed-methods service evaluation examining feasibility, acceptability, implementation processes and perceived benefits was conducted, structured around the organisations six step service model. Data sources included document review and stakeholder consultation, focus groups with peer support volunteers (n = 8) and service users who had completed the programme (n = 9), interviews/consultation with key organisational personnel (n = 2) and referring healthcare professionals (n = 3). Qualitative data were synthesised thematically within the six steps framework and triangulated with descriptive survey results from service monitoring data, and satisfaction surveys (n = 8). Findings The service was perceived as acceptable and beneficial, with participants reporting perceived improvements in emotional wellbeing practical coping support, and high likelihood of recommending the service. Implementation strengths included a clear recruitment pathway, comprehensive training and reflective supervision and a structured referral–triage–matching process. Key implementation challenges related to optimising promotion and referral flow (beyond hospital settings), improving referral efficiency (e.g. electronic referral) and enhancing matching to service-user preferences to minimise mismatch. Quality assurance processes were in place, with recommendations to strengthen real-time feedback collection and routine outcome monitoring. Originality/value This study provides one of the first implementation-focused evaluations of a national, online kidney peer support model, offering a practical six steps-based blueprint and empirically grounded recommendations to support optimisation, scale-up and sustainability.

Mental Health and Digital Technologies
Health Outcomes Solutions (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.