Magnetosphere–ionosphere response to the 21 and 25 June 2015 coronal mass ejections

Abstract. Using a coupled EUHFORIA–Gorgon-Space modelling chain, we simulate the magnetosphere–ionosphere coupled response to two coronal mass ejections (CMEs) that impacted Earth on 23 and 28 June 2015. The first CME (CME1), launched on 21 June, triggered a major geomagnetic storm (Kp = 8), driving strong magnetosphere–ionosphere coupling characterised by a cross-polar cap potential of 160 kV and intense field-aligned currents exceeding 23 MA, key indicators of energy transfer from the solar wind into the high-latitude ionosphere. In contrast, the faster CME2 (launched on 25 June) produced only a weak disturbance (Kp ≈ 2) due to the absence of a prolonged southward interplanetary magnetic field (IMF), resulting in minimal magnetospheric driving and ionospheric feedback. These results validate an end-to-end space-weather forecasting framework and demonstrate that CME geoeffectiveness is governed primarily by the IMF orientation and reconnection-driven magnetosphere–ionosphere energy coupling, rather than by kinematic properties such as speed alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annales Geophysicae
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-44-743-2026
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Magnetosphere–ionosphere response to the 21 and 25 June 2015 coronal mass ejections

Stefaan Poedts, S. Sabri
Annales Geophysicae
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
article

Magnetosphere–ionosphere response to the 21 and 25 June 2015 coronal mass ejections

Stefaan Poedts, S. Sabri
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Using a coupled EUHFORIA–Gorgon-Space modelling chain, we simulate the magnetosphere–ionosphere coupled response to two coronal mass ejections (CMEs) that impacted Earth on 23 and 28 June 2015. The first CME (CME1), launched on 21 June, triggered a major geomagnetic storm (Kp = 8), driving strong magnetosphere–ionosphere coupling characterised by a cross-polar cap potential of 160 kV and intense field-aligned currents exceeding 23 MA, key indicators of energy transfer from the solar wind into the high-latitude ionosphere. In contrast, the faster CME2 (launched on 25 June) produced only a weak disturbance (Kp ≈ 2) due to the absence of a prolonged southward interplanetary magnetic field (IMF), resulting in minimal magnetospheric driving and ionospheric feedback. These results validate an end-to-end space-weather forecasting framework and demonstrate that CME geoeffectiveness is governed primarily by the IMF orientation and reconnection-driven magnetosphere–ionosphere energy coupling, rather than by kinematic properties such as speed alone.

Annales GeophysicaeVol. 44(2)
Maria Curie-Skłodowska University (PL), University of Tehran (IR), KU Leuven (BE)
European Commission, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, KU Leuven
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.