Closer to Command, further from support – The future architecture of U.S. Special Operations

This article argues that U.S. Special Operations Forces (USSOF) are moving towards an historically distinctive operational model – networked autonomy – in which the small team at the tactical edge is imagined as both more locally self-sufficient and more tightly integrated with higher command, including the strategic level. Drawing on U.S. Special Operations Command procurement documents, a corpus not previously used in English-language USSOF scholarship, the article outlines this technological architecture across five interlocking pillars. It then discusses operational and tactical challenges inherent in networked autonomy and, ultimately, argues that emerging technologies do not merely enable special operations, but increasingly define the tactical edge, with potentially strategic and political implications.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Defense and Security Analysis
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2026.2711568
Primary Topic
Military Strategy and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Closer to Command, further from support – The future architecture of U.S. Special Operations

Anna Gielas
Defense and Security Analysis
Military Strategy and Technology
article

Closer to Command, further from support – The future architecture of U.S. Special Operations

Anna Gielas
article en

Abstract

This article argues that U.S. Special Operations Forces (USSOF) are moving towards an historically distinctive operational model – networked autonomy – in which the small team at the tactical edge is imagined as both more locally self-sufficient and more tightly integrated with higher command, including the strategic level. Drawing on U.S. Special Operations Command procurement documents, a corpus not previously used in English-language USSOF scholarship, the article outlines this technological architecture across five interlocking pillars. It then discusses operational and tactical challenges inherent in networked autonomy and, ultimately, argues that emerging technologies do not merely enable special operations, but increasingly define the tactical edge, with potentially strategic and political implications.

Defense and Security Analysis
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Military Strategy and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.