A Delphi–Monte Carlo Framework for Probabilistic KPI Estimation in Public-Sector AI Projects

Public-sector organisations must often commit to AI adoption decisions before longitudinal performance data are available to inform them. This study introduces and preliminarily demonstrates a Delphi–PERT–Monte Carlo framework for probabilistic KPI estimation in public-sector AI projects, applied to Kazakhstan’s e-government environment. A three-round modified Delphi study was conducted with 20 domain experts (competence threshold K ≥ 0.70). The Technology–Organisation–Environment framework structured elicitation across three AI scenarios (S0: no AI; S1: partial automation; S2: advanced AI) and four KPIs: timeline, cost, risk detection, and process transparency. Categorical percentage-band responses were translated into PERT distributions via a documented band-to-midpoint mapping rule and simulated through 10,000 Monte Carlo iterations. All outputs reflect structured expert belief, not observed performance data. Under S2, timeline effects were directionally ambiguous (P50 = −0.5%; bootstrap 95% CI: [−5.0%, +13.5%]); cost was consistently positive (P50 = +13.7%), reflecting near-term implementation cost increases expected by 55% of panelists. Risk detection (P50 = +5.8%; CI: [+3.7%, +12.8%]) and transparency (P50 = +8.2%; CI: [+2.5%, +8.8%]) showed modest but stable positive effects. Round 3 returned 80% consensus acceptance. The framework provides a replicable, sensitivity-tested procedure for generating probabilistic planning inputs in expert-data-scarce contexts; the Kazakhstan case is its first Central Asian application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14081003
Primary Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Delphi–Monte Carlo Framework for Probabilistic KPI Estimation in Public-Sector AI Projects

Rymkul Ismailova, Nurgul Yesmagulova, Nurkhat Ibadildin, Aiman Kadyrova et al.
Systems
Delphi Technique in Research
article

A Delphi–Monte Carlo Framework for Probabilistic KPI Estimation in Public-Sector AI Projects

Rymkul Ismailova, Nurgul Yesmagulova, Nurkhat Ibadildin, Aiman Kadyrova, Issabayeva Symbat
article en

Abstract

Public-sector organisations must often commit to AI adoption decisions before longitudinal performance data are available to inform them. This study introduces and preliminarily demonstrates a Delphi–PERT–Monte Carlo framework for probabilistic KPI estimation in public-sector AI projects, applied to Kazakhstan’s e-government environment. A three-round modified Delphi study was conducted with 20 domain experts (competence threshold K ≥ 0.70). The Technology–Organisation–Environment framework structured elicitation across three AI scenarios (S0: no AI; S1: partial automation; S2: advanced AI) and four KPIs: timeline, cost, risk detection, and process transparency. Categorical percentage-band responses were translated into PERT distributions via a documented band-to-midpoint mapping rule and simulated through 10,000 Monte Carlo iterations. All outputs reflect structured expert belief, not observed performance data. Under S2, timeline effects were directionally ambiguous (P50 = −0.5%; bootstrap 95% CI: [−5.0%, +13.5%]); cost was consistently positive (P50 = +13.7%), reflecting near-term implementation cost increases expected by 55% of panelists. Risk detection (P50 = +5.8%; CI: [+3.7%, +12.8%]) and transparency (P50 = +8.2%; CI: [+2.5%, +8.8%]) showed modest but stable positive effects. Round 3 returned 80% consensus acceptance. The framework provides a replicable, sensitivity-tested procedure for generating probabilistic planning inputs in expert-data-scarce contexts; the Kazakhstan case is its first Central Asian application.

SystemsVol. 14(8)
Astana Medical University (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Delphi Technique in Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.