Exact Limits of Random Projections for Preserving Geometry: Distance Recovery, Nearest-Neighbor Rankings, and Covariance Shape in Gaussian Models

The Johnson–Lindenstrauss (JL) lemma is a foundational result in high-dimensional geometry: a suitable random map into m = O(ε⁻² log n) dimensions preserves all pairwise distances among n points within a factor of 1 ± ε. Yet this relative-error guarantee does not separately control the fine-scale information needed to rank neighbors or estimate covariance shape. We quantify how much information linear sketches retain beyond preserving distances. We first show how JL bounds limit fine-scale geometric recovery. For Gaussian data, pairwise distances concentrate around a common baseline, while centered fluctuations carry comparative geometry. We show that, to certify these fluctuations, the projection dimension must scale with the ambient dimension itself, eliminating compression. We then prove that an independent Gaussian cloud in ℝᵐ, matched only to the mean distance, can satisfy the JL bounds while remaining independent of the data. Consequently, JL bounds alone cannot certify the geometric information that a linear sketch retains. We next establish exact recovery limits for distance features, neighbor rankings, and covariance shape. For isotropic data, the squared distance splits into independent retained and discarded components. We prove an estimator-independent limit: no square-integrable distance feature retains more than a fraction m/d of its variance, corresponding to correlation √(m/d). Using a Laguerre expansion, we resolve the recoverable variance of each fluctuation mode. For general covariance, optimal distance-value recovery equals the leading-m share of squared-eigenvalue mass, though nonlinear features can exceed this share under uneven spectral retention. Rankings inherit the correlation scale. Pairwise agreement is only Θ(√(m/d)) above chance, and fixed-candidate nearest-neighbor overlap approaches chance as m/d → 0. We also prove that a single sampled projection can satisfy a uniform JL bound even as its mean Kendall correlation vanishes when log n ≪ m ≪ d. Averaged over Haar projections, mean and scale information retain a fraction m/d, whereas diffuse traceless shape retains exactly (m−1)(m+2)/((d−1)(d+2)) ∼ (m/d)² once overall scale is removed. For a general known map, its rank governs optimal inference, its spectral spread limits uncorrected norm estimation, and its small singular values control noisy inversion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21984262
Primary Topic
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
Type
preprint

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Exact Limits of Random Projections for Preserving Geometry: Distance Recovery, Nearest-Neighbor Rankings, and Covariance Shape in Gaussian Models

Piyush Sao
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
preprint

Exact Limits of Random Projections for Preserving Geometry: Distance Recovery, Nearest-Neighbor Rankings, and Covariance Shape in Gaussian Models

Piyush Sao
preprint en

Abstract

The Johnson–Lindenstrauss (JL) lemma is a foundational result in high-dimensional geometry: a suitable random map into m = O(ε⁻² log n) dimensions preserves all pairwise distances among n points within a factor of 1 ± ε. Yet this relative-error guarantee does not separately control the fine-scale information needed to rank neighbors or estimate covariance shape. We quantify how much information linear sketches retain beyond preserving distances. We first show how JL bounds limit fine-scale geometric recovery. For Gaussian data, pairwise distances concentrate around a common baseline, while centered fluctuations carry comparative geometry. We show that, to certify these fluctuations, the projection dimension must scale with the ambient dimension itself, eliminating compression. We then prove that an independent Gaussian cloud in ℝᵐ, matched only to the mean distance, can satisfy the JL bounds while remaining independent of the data. Consequently, JL bounds alone cannot certify the geometric information that a linear sketch retains. We next establish exact recovery limits for distance features, neighbor rankings, and covariance shape. For isotropic data, the squared distance splits into independent retained and discarded components. We prove an estimator-independent limit: no square-integrable distance feature retains more than a fraction m/d of its variance, corresponding to correlation √(m/d). Using a Laguerre expansion, we resolve the recoverable variance of each fluctuation mode. For general covariance, optimal distance-value recovery equals the leading-m share of squared-eigenvalue mass, though nonlinear features can exceed this share under uneven spectral retention. Rankings inherit the correlation scale. Pairwise agreement is only Θ(√(m/d)) above chance, and fixed-candidate nearest-neighbor overlap approaches chance as m/d → 0. We also prove that a single sampled projection can satisfy a uniform JL bound even as its mean Kendall correlation vanishes when log n ≪ m ≪ d. Averaged over Haar projections, mean and scale information retain a fraction m/d, whereas diffuse traceless shape retains exactly (m−1)(m+2)/((d−1)(d+2)) ∼ (m/d)² once overall scale is removed. For a general known map, its rank governs optimal inference, its spectral spread limits uncorrected norm estimation, and its small singular values control noisy inversion.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
U.S. Department of Energy
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.