Seismic Response Evaluation of Irregular Reinforced Concrete Buildings Using an Integrated IAF–NRI–ISS Framework

Structural irregularities can alter seismic deformation and internal force requirements, but comparisons of different types of irregularities using a single set of response measures remain limited. This research introduces a response-index framework for comparing seismic performance of irregular reinforced concrete (RC) buildings. Nine ten-storey RC models, one regular reference and eight with irregularities such as mass, re-entrant corners, vertical stiffness, and geometric irregularities, were evaluated through Response Spectrum Analysis. Six response parameters—roof displacement, maximum storey drift, drift ratio, base shear, column axial force, and column bending moment—were assessed using the Irregularity Amplification Factor (IAF), Normalized Response Index (NRI), Deformation–Force indices (DI–FI), and Irregularity Severity Score (ISS). The framework integrates response amplification, normalization, behavioral classification, and overall ranking within a unified reference-based process. The vertical stiffness model S-2 achieved the highest ISS (1.461), primarily due to a bending moment of 404.57 kip-ft, followed by S-1 (ISS = 1.285). Sensitivity analysis showed that S-2 consistently remained the top-ranked option, except when the bending moment was excluded. The framework provides a concise basis for identifying dominant response mechanisms and comparing the rankings of irregular configurations, thereby aiding seismic assessment and informing design decisions for RC buildings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16163255
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seismic Response Evaluation of Irregular Reinforced Concrete Buildings Using an Integrated IAF–NRI–ISS Framework

Yue Pan, Adil Rafiq, Muhammad Fahad Ullah, Zeeshan Khan
Buildings
Seismic Performance and Analysis
article

Seismic Response Evaluation of Irregular Reinforced Concrete Buildings Using an Integrated IAF–NRI–ISS Framework

Yue Pan, Adil Rafiq, Muhammad Fahad Ullah, Zeeshan Khan
article en

Abstract

Structural irregularities can alter seismic deformation and internal force requirements, but comparisons of different types of irregularities using a single set of response measures remain limited. This research introduces a response-index framework for comparing seismic performance of irregular reinforced concrete (RC) buildings. Nine ten-storey RC models, one regular reference and eight with irregularities such as mass, re-entrant corners, vertical stiffness, and geometric irregularities, were evaluated through Response Spectrum Analysis. Six response parameters—roof displacement, maximum storey drift, drift ratio, base shear, column axial force, and column bending moment—were assessed using the Irregularity Amplification Factor (IAF), Normalized Response Index (NRI), Deformation–Force indices (DI–FI), and Irregularity Severity Score (ISS). The framework integrates response amplification, normalization, behavioral classification, and overall ranking within a unified reference-based process. The vertical stiffness model S-2 achieved the highest ISS (1.461), primarily due to a bending moment of 404.57 kip-ft, followed by S-1 (ISS = 1.285). Sensitivity analysis showed that S-2 consistently remained the top-ranked option, except when the bending moment was excluded. The framework provides a concise basis for identifying dominant response mechanisms and comparing the rankings of irregular configurations, thereby aiding seismic assessment and informing design decisions for RC buildings.

BuildingsVol. 16(16)
Tongji University (CN), Tianjin University (CN)
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.