Non‐Invasive Methods for Identifying Electrical Responders to Conduction System Pacing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
BACKGROUND: Conduction system pacing (CSP) is an emerging alternative modality of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, not all patients obtain electrical resynchronization with CSP, there is a clinical need for reliable non-invasive predictors of response. We aimed to assess the ability of several non-invasive modalities to predict electrical resynchronization with CSP-CRT. METHODS: Patients with standard heart failure CRT indications (excluding right-bundle branch block) underwent CSP-CRT using His-bundle and left-bundle branch pacing. Electrical resynchronization was defined as a >10 ms reduction in left ventricular activation time or conversion to a physiological left ventricular activation pattern on non-invasive multi-electrode mapping. We assessed whether 12-lead ECG morphology, vector electrocardiogram (VCG) derived QRS area, Ultra High Frequency (UHF)-ECG parameters or MRI scar burden predicted electrical resynchronization. RESULTS: Thirty four patients were analyzed (mean age 69±10 years; 82% male; LVEF 30±6%; QRS duration 161±23 ms; 32% ischemic cardiomyopathy). Electrical resynchronization was achieved in 24/34 (71%; 95%CI 53-85). Strauss criteria positivity on 12-lead ECG yielded a positive predictive value (PPV) of 83% (95%CI 61-95%) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 55% (95%CI 23-83%). VCG QRS area >100µVs demonstrated PPV 100% (95% CI 81-100%) and NPV 73% (95%CI 85-100%). UHF-ECG e-DYS >50 ms gave PPV 93% (95%CI 66-100%) and NPV 47% (23%-72%); >60 ms gave PPV 90% (95%CI 66-100%) and NPV 38% (95%CI 18-62%). MRI scar burden <15% resulted in PPV 88% (95%CI 64-99%) and NPV 56% (95%CI 21-86%). Lines of propagation discontinuity on multi-electrode mapping showed PPV 100% (95%CI 85-100%) and NPV 83% (95%CI 52-98%). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple non-invasive markers, including QRS morphology, VCG QRS area, UHF-ECG e-DYS, MRI scar burden showed potential to identify patients who are likely to electrically resynchronize with CSP-CRT, although their NPVs were generally modest. Non-invasive propagation mapping had the highest PPV and NPV.
Authors
- Ji‐Jian Chow (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2454-7644)
- Yixiu Liang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5467-8958)
- P. Boon Lim
- Nick Linton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5712-849X)
- Karol Čurila (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3523-6358)
- Ahran Arnold (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7597-0170)
- Nandita Kaza (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8725-5679)
- Frits W. Prinzen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8917-9032)
- Mark Tanner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6706-6536)
- Pavel Leinveber (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7267-4408)
- Chetanya Sharma (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4148-5000)
- Pavel Jurák (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3793-5075)
- Keenan Saleh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9385-9276)
- Akriti Naraen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1681-2981)
- Zachary I. Whinnett (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2775-5126)
- Jack Samways (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9090-9610)
- Nadine Ali (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3169-4776)
- Nicholas S. Peters (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3581-8078)
- Jagdeep Singh Mohal
- Graham Cole
- D.P. Francis
- James P. Howard
- Fu Siong Ng
- Norman Qureshi
- Matthew Shun-Shin
- Prapa Kanagaratnam
- David C. Lefroy
- Amal Muthumala
- Judith M. Lubrecht
- Daniel Keene
Institutions
- St Bartholomew's Hospital (GB)
- Charles University (CZ)
- Barts Health NHS Trust (GB)
- Fudan University (CN)
- London North West Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
- Hammersmith Hospital (GB)
- Maastricht University (NL)
- Lung Institute (US)
- Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Scientific Instruments (CZ)
- North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust (GB)
- University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady (CZ)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Published
- 2026-08-17
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70393
- Primary Topic
- Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00