Study on the efficiency of industry-university-research collaborative innovation in China based on a two-stage game cross-efficiency model incorporating Shapley value

This study evaluates the efficiency of China's industry-university-research collaborative innovation (IURCI) system using a two-stage game cross-efficiency model integrated with Shapley values. By constructing an evaluation index system that captures the two stages of innovation: research and development (R&D) and technology transfer, and introducing the Shapley value to quantify the contributions of variables at each stage, this study addresses the limitations of traditional data envelopment analysis (DEA) models in weight allocation and competition handling. The empirical results indicate that: (1) China's IURCI efficiency exhibits a clear pattern of high R&D efficiency but low transfer efficiency. (2) the central region demonstrates the highest overall efficiency with relatively balanced performance across both stages, while the eastern region leads in R&D but lags in technology transfer, and the western and northeastern regions experience pronounced stage imbalances. (3) innovation resource allocation tends to emphasize transfer while neglecting R&D with enterprises' leading role in innovation insufficiently realized. Accordingly, this study recommends optimizing resource allocation mechanisms, strengthening the leadership role of enterprises, promoting the development of technology markets, and implementing differentiated regional policies to enhance the overall effectiveness of IURCI in China.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0354999
Primary Topic
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study on the efficiency of industry-university-research collaborative innovation in China based on a two-stage game cross-efficiency model incorporating Shapley value

Xiaoling Ji, Xiaoqing Li
PLoS ONE
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
article

Study on the efficiency of industry-university-research collaborative innovation in China based on a two-stage game cross-efficiency model incorporating Shapley value

Xiaoling Ji, Xiaoqing Li
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the efficiency of China's industry-university-research collaborative innovation (IURCI) system using a two-stage game cross-efficiency model integrated with Shapley values. By constructing an evaluation index system that captures the two stages of innovation: research and development (R&D) and technology transfer, and introducing the Shapley value to quantify the contributions of variables at each stage, this study addresses the limitations of traditional data envelopment analysis (DEA) models in weight allocation and competition handling. The empirical results indicate that: (1) China's IURCI efficiency exhibits a clear pattern of high R&D efficiency but low transfer efficiency. (2) the central region demonstrates the highest overall efficiency with relatively balanced performance across both stages, while the eastern region leads in R&D but lags in technology transfer, and the western and northeastern regions experience pronounced stage imbalances. (3) innovation resource allocation tends to emphasize transfer while neglecting R&D with enterprises' leading role in innovation insufficiently realized. Accordingly, this study recommends optimizing resource allocation mechanisms, strengthening the leadership role of enterprises, promoting the development of technology markets, and implementing differentiated regional policies to enhance the overall effectiveness of IURCI in China.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(8)
Minnan University of Science and Technology (CN), Xiamen University of Technology (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.