Five-year survival and prognostic factors of cervical cancer (stages I-IV) in Rwanda: a population-based analysis, 2017–2021

Cervical cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women in low- and middle-income countries. This study assessed five-year survival and prognostic factors among patients diagnosed with cervical cancer in Rwanda. We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using data from the Rwanda National Cancer Registry, including patients diagnosed with cervical cancer (Stages I–IV) between 2017 and 2021. Survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and prognostic factors were identified using Cox proportional hazards models. A total of 1,075 patients were included. The mean age at diagnosis was 54.1 years (SD 12.7). FIGO stage distribution at diagnosis was as follows: Stage I (9.0%), Stage II (18.7%), Stage III (32.0%), Stage IV (10.5%), and unknown stage (29.8%). During follow-up, 20.0% of patients died, while 77.7% were censored. An advanced stage at diagnosis was significantly associated with increased mortality (Stage IV vs. Stage I: aHR = 3.84, 95% CI: 1.98–7.45; p < 0.001). In sensitivity analyses, including a worst-case scenario in which the missing stage was classified as Stage IV, the association between advanced stage and mortality remained robust (Stage IV vs. Stage I: aHR = 2.43, 95% CI: 1.26–4.70; p = 0.008). Survival among cervical cancer patients in Rwanda remains strongly associated with stage at diagnosis. The high proportion of advanced-stage disease and missing stage data underscores the need for improved early detection, data completeness, and follow-up systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cancer
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-16763-z
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Five-year survival and prognostic factors of cervical cancer (stages I-IV) in Rwanda: a population-based analysis, 2017–2021

Mojeed Akorede Gbadamosi, Iradukunda Ange
BMC Cancer
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

Five-year survival and prognostic factors of cervical cancer (stages I-IV) in Rwanda: a population-based analysis, 2017–2021

Mojeed Akorede Gbadamosi, Iradukunda Ange
article en

Abstract

Cervical cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women in low- and middle-income countries. This study assessed five-year survival and prognostic factors among patients diagnosed with cervical cancer in Rwanda. We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using data from the Rwanda National Cancer Registry, including patients diagnosed with cervical cancer (Stages I–IV) between 2017 and 2021. Survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and prognostic factors were identified using Cox proportional hazards models. A total of 1,075 patients were included. The mean age at diagnosis was 54.1 years (SD 12.7). FIGO stage distribution at diagnosis was as follows: Stage I (9.0%), Stage II (18.7%), Stage III (32.0%), Stage IV (10.5%), and unknown stage (29.8%). During follow-up, 20.0% of patients died, while 77.7% were censored. An advanced stage at diagnosis was significantly associated with increased mortality (Stage IV vs. Stage I: aHR = 3.84, 95% CI: 1.98–7.45; p < 0.001). In sensitivity analyses, including a worst-case scenario in which the missing stage was classified as Stage IV, the association between advanced stage and mortality remained robust (Stage IV vs. Stage I: aHR = 2.43, 95% CI: 1.26–4.70; p = 0.008). Survival among cervical cancer patients in Rwanda remains strongly associated with stage at diagnosis. The high proportion of advanced-stage disease and missing stage data underscores the need for improved early detection, data completeness, and follow-up systems.

BMC Cancer
Mount Kenya University (KE), University of Rwanda (RW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.