Association Between Follow-Up Mean Blood Pressure and Blood Pressure Control: A Meta-Regression Analysis of 101 Randomized Trials
BACKGROUND: The relationship between mean blood pressure (BP) and BP control remains uncertain, particularly the mean BP required to achieve BP control (<140/90 mm Hg) in most patients. This review assesses the association between mean BP and BP control using data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs). METHODS: Electronic literature databases were searched to identify individual RCTs (iRCTs) and cluster RCTs (cRCTs) that randomized adults to BP-lowering interventions and reported both mean BP at final follow-up visit (mean BP) and the proportion of participants achieving BP control at the final follow-up visit (BP control). RESULTS: A linear regression model was used to evaluate the association between mean BP and BP control. A total of 101 RCTs (65 iRCTs [57 201 participants] and 36 cRCTs [28 154 participants]) were included. Overall, mean systolic BP (SBP) of 120, 125, 130, and 135 mm Hg corresponded to BP control in 85%, 75%, 65% and 55% of the participants in iRCTs and 87%, 77%, 67%, 57% in cRCTs. Each 1 mm Hg reduction in mean SBP was associated with approximately a 2% increase in BP control (Pseudo- R 2 =78% for iRCTs; 76% for cRCTs). This association was consistent across BP-lowering drug classes, baseline SBP categories, and pretrial treatment status in iRCTs, and across country income levels and baseline SBP categories in cRCTs. A similar association was seen for DBP. CONCLUSIONS: An SBP below 125 mm Hg was associated with achieving BP control in ≈80% of patients. These findings can inform guideline recommendations, guide clinical management and shape hypertension control programs.
Authors
- Anthony Rodgers (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1282-1896)
- Sonali Rukshana Gnanenthiran (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4145-6461)
- Faraidoon Haghdoost (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3912-5874)
- Prachi Kaistha (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7272-7191)
- Paul K. Whelton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2225-383X)
- Gautam Satheesh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2211-145X)
- Mark D. Huffman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7412-2519)
- Anshika Mittal (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0711-8266)
- Rupasvi Dhurjati (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8579-3972)
- Rashmi Pant (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3424-1155)
- Shwetha Rajaram (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7645-4488)
- Neil R Poulter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6292-997X)
- Raju Kanukula (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0793-786X)
- Abdul Salam (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5870-7936)
- Hari Prasad (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0486-1919)
- Vidyasagar Kota
- Krishna Nandakumar
- Sasi Kumar Tiruttani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0967-5405)
Institutions
- Tulane University (US)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN)
- University of South Australia (AU)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Tula University (RU)
- NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (GB)
- The George Institute for Global Health (AU)
- Faculty of Design (SI)
- George Institute for Global Health (IN)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Keele University (GB)
- The University of Adelaide (AU)
- United Nations Population Fund (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Hypertension
- Published
- 2026-08-17
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.125.26580
- Primary Topic
- Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00