Excising the Extra: A Scoping Review of Direct Excision Safety, Complications, and Prevention Strategies in Facial Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

PURPOSE: Direct excision is a foundational technique. It has applications across the periorbital, nasal, and cervical regions. Our goal is to define the safety profile of direct excision and compile best practices for optimizing outcomes. To our knowledge, it has not been clearly characterized in the literature. METHODS: A structured literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar identified studies published between 2011 and 2026 that evaluated the complications, safety, and outcomes of direct excision in facial aesthetic surgery. Following PRISMA guidelines, 11 studies were included. Complications were classified as major, early minor (within 30 d), or late minor (beyond 30 d). RESULTS: Eleven studies encompassing 410 patients across periorbital (n=65, 15.8%), nasal (n=107, 26.1%), and cervical (n=238, 58%) regions were analyzed. No major complications were identified in the periorbital or nasal direct excision. Periorbital early minor complications included transient lower eyelid dislocation (3/53, 5.7%) and edema (N not reported). Scarring was the predominant reported late sequela across all regions. Nasal yielded delayed wound healing (2/21, 9.5%) and hypertrophic scarring (3/21, 14%). Cervical cancer carried the highest complication burden. This included hematomas requiring emergent reoperation (2/112, 1.8%), ecchymosis (10/47, 21.3%), hypertrophic scarring (8/47, 17%), sialocele (5/112, 4.5%), and marginal mandibular neurapraxia (5/112, 4.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Direct excision demonstrates a favorable safety profile across the periorbital and nasal regions. Major complications were confined to the cervical region. Preoperative patient selection, meticulous intraoperative technique, and prompt recognition of postoperative complications are essential. Future prospective studies with standardized reporting of complications are needed to strengthen evidence-based recommendations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000013241
Primary Topic
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Excising the Extra: A Scoping Review of Direct Excision Safety, Complications, and Prevention Strategies in Facial Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

Jonathan Yasmeh, K. Miller, Wrood Kassira, Stephanie Riveron et al.
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
article

Excising the Extra: A Scoping Review of Direct Excision Safety, Complications, and Prevention Strategies in Facial Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

Jonathan Yasmeh, K. Miller, Wrood Kassira, Stephanie Riveron, Seth Thaller, Stuti Garg, Benjamin Slavin, Susan Taghioff
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Direct excision is a foundational technique. It has applications across the periorbital, nasal, and cervical regions. Our goal is to define the safety profile of direct excision and compile best practices for optimizing outcomes. To our knowledge, it has not been clearly characterized in the literature. METHODS: A structured literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar identified studies published between 2011 and 2026 that evaluated the complications, safety, and outcomes of direct excision in facial aesthetic surgery. Following PRISMA guidelines, 11 studies were included. Complications were classified as major, early minor (within 30 d), or late minor (beyond 30 d). RESULTS: Eleven studies encompassing 410 patients across periorbital (n=65, 15.8%), nasal (n=107, 26.1%), and cervical (n=238, 58%) regions were analyzed. No major complications were identified in the periorbital or nasal direct excision. Periorbital early minor complications included transient lower eyelid dislocation (3/53, 5.7%) and edema (N not reported). Scarring was the predominant reported late sequela across all regions. Nasal yielded delayed wound healing (2/21, 9.5%) and hypertrophic scarring (3/21, 14%). Cervical cancer carried the highest complication burden. This included hematomas requiring emergent reoperation (2/112, 1.8%), ecchymosis (10/47, 21.3%), hypertrophic scarring (8/47, 17%), sialocele (5/112, 4.5%), and marginal mandibular neurapraxia (5/112, 4.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Direct excision demonstrates a favorable safety profile across the periorbital and nasal regions. Major complications were confined to the cervical region. Preoperative patient selection, meticulous intraoperative technique, and prompt recognition of postoperative complications are essential. Future prospective studies with standardized reporting of complications are needed to strengthen evidence-based recommendations.

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
University of Miami (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.