Productivity-based sampling for field-scale soil organic carbon mapping: from regional models to carbon farming needs

This study evaluates an innovative field-scale targeted sampling strategy within a regional hybrid spatial prediction model that combines machine learning and geostatistics. The framework is designed so that newly collected field observations are incorporated only through the local residual kriging step, while the regional Random Forest trend model remains unchanged, allowing field-scale predictions to be refined without full model refitting. The proposed sampling approach integrates a Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI)-based Productivity Index, a field-specific index derived from long-term satellite-based NDVI time series, with regional model-derived prediction uncertainty. The approach was evaluated on 28 test agricultural fields containing 7 to 19 in-field soil organic carbon (SOC) observations, which allowed assessment across diverse sampling configurations and levels of within-field variability. The results showed that the regional model alone provided a reasonable baseline prediction (mean root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.24% SOC) but was unable to adequately represent local spatial heterogeneity. Incorporating all available field observations produced the highest accuracy (mean RMSE = 0.17% SOC), while the proposed targeted sampling strategy achieved comparable performance (mean RMSE = 0.18% SOC) using only four strategically selected samples. In contrast, the results also showed that seemingly representative random sampling can lead to poor predictions when informative locations are missed, in some cases performing even worse than the regional model alone. In addition to conventional accuracy metrics, minimum detectable change (MDC) was used to evaluate the capability of the framework to detect meaningful SOC changes beyond prediction error, relevant for SOC monitoring and carbon farming. The results demonstrate that integrating regional models with productivity-based targeted sampling can substantially improve field-scale SOC prediction while avoiding the risks of misleading assessments associated with unfavorable sampling configurations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-026-15793-1
Primary Topic
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Productivity-based sampling for field-scale soil organic carbon mapping: from regional models to carbon farming needs

Milan Kilibarda, Dragutin Protić, Milutin Pejović, Branislav Bajat
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
article

Productivity-based sampling for field-scale soil organic carbon mapping: from regional models to carbon farming needs

Milan Kilibarda, Dragutin Protić, Milutin Pejović, Branislav Bajat
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates an innovative field-scale targeted sampling strategy within a regional hybrid spatial prediction model that combines machine learning and geostatistics. The framework is designed so that newly collected field observations are incorporated only through the local residual kriging step, while the regional Random Forest trend model remains unchanged, allowing field-scale predictions to be refined without full model refitting. The proposed sampling approach integrates a Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI)-based Productivity Index, a field-specific index derived from long-term satellite-based NDVI time series, with regional model-derived prediction uncertainty. The approach was evaluated on 28 test agricultural fields containing 7 to 19 in-field soil organic carbon (SOC) observations, which allowed assessment across diverse sampling configurations and levels of within-field variability. The results showed that the regional model alone provided a reasonable baseline prediction (mean root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.24% SOC) but was unable to adequately represent local spatial heterogeneity. Incorporating all available field observations produced the highest accuracy (mean RMSE = 0.17% SOC), while the proposed targeted sampling strategy achieved comparable performance (mean RMSE = 0.18% SOC) using only four strategically selected samples. In contrast, the results also showed that seemingly representative random sampling can lead to poor predictions when informative locations are missed, in some cases performing even worse than the regional model alone. In addition to conventional accuracy metrics, minimum detectable change (MDC) was used to evaluate the capability of the framework to detect meaningful SOC changes beyond prediction error, relevant for SOC monitoring and carbon farming. The results demonstrate that integrating regional models with productivity-based targeted sampling can substantially improve field-scale SOC prediction while avoiding the risks of misleading assessments associated with unfavorable sampling configurations.

Environmental Monitoring and AssessmentVol. 198(9)
University of Belgrade (RS)
European Commission, Ministarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog Razvoja, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.