A systematic review of divine forgiveness self-report measures

Abstract Background Divine forgiveness (DF) can be defined as the perception of being absolved from sin by a Higher Power. Psychological research is increasingly recognizing DF as a relevant construct with implications for well-being, coping, and spirituality. Despite this growing awareness, empirical studies on DF have often relied on conceptually and psychometrically questionable measures, limiting theoretical and cross-cultural advancement. The aim of this study was to systematically review the existing quantitative self-report measures of DF, assessing their characteristics and psychometric properties. Methods A systematic search was conducted across four databases (Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, and PubMed), following PRISMA guidelines. Results Sixty studies met inclusion criteria, most of them based on U.S. samples and employing short, predominantly unidimensional scales. Our analysis showed that the majority of instruments captured general beliefs about having been forgiven by God while only a few explicitly assessed experiential, emotional, or multidimensional aspects of DF. Psychometric evidence was limited: most studies reported only internal consistency, while factorial validity, invariance across groups, and broader validity evidence were rarely examined. Conclusions Overall, these findings highlight the need to develop theoretically grounded and psychometrically robust instruments that assess the multiple facets of the experience of DF, and that are sensitive to cultural and religious diversity. The available DF measures should be considered preliminary tools that require further development in order to fully capture the complex, multidimensional, and culturally embedded nature of the construct.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-05298-4
Primary Topic
Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic review of divine forgiveness self-report measures

Yaakov Greenwald, Lucrezia Cavagnis, Daniela Barni, Francesca Giorgia Paleari et al.
BMC Psychology
Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
article

A systematic review of divine forgiveness self-report measures

Yaakov Greenwald, Lucrezia Cavagnis, Daniela Barni, Francesca Giorgia Paleari, Camillo Regalia, Francesca Danioni, Valentina Valtulini, Sara Eissa
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Divine forgiveness (DF) can be defined as the perception of being absolved from sin by a Higher Power. Psychological research is increasingly recognizing DF as a relevant construct with implications for well-being, coping, and spirituality. Despite this growing awareness, empirical studies on DF have often relied on conceptually and psychometrically questionable measures, limiting theoretical and cross-cultural advancement. The aim of this study was to systematically review the existing quantitative self-report measures of DF, assessing their characteristics and psychometric properties. Methods A systematic search was conducted across four databases (Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, and PubMed), following PRISMA guidelines. Results Sixty studies met inclusion criteria, most of them based on U.S. samples and employing short, predominantly unidimensional scales. Our analysis showed that the majority of instruments captured general beliefs about having been forgiven by God while only a few explicitly assessed experiential, emotional, or multidimensional aspects of DF. Psychometric evidence was limited: most studies reported only internal consistency, while factorial validity, invariance across groups, and broader validity evidence were rarely examined. Conclusions Overall, these findings highlight the need to develop theoretically grounded and psychometrically robust instruments that assess the multiple facets of the experience of DF, and that are sensitive to cultural and religious diversity. The available DF measures should be considered preliminary tools that require further development in order to fully capture the complex, multidimensional, and culturally embedded nature of the construct.

BMC Psychology
University of Bergamo (IT), University of Milan (IT), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.