Share, verify, or ignore? Analysis of older adults’ responses to misinformation and disinformation

As digital environments increasingly shape everyday life in later adulthood, older adults are exposed to growing volumes of misinformation and disinformation. Understanding how they interpret and manage misleading content is essential for developing effective educational interventions. Less is also known about the combination of emotional, cognitive, and behavioral responses to misinformation and disinformation in older adults. This qualitative study explores how adults aged 65+ respond to misinformation and disinformation and identifies recurring response patterns. Sixty-three semi-structured interviews conducted across the Czech Republic were analyzed using thematic analysis. Three dominant response types were identified: emotional, cognitive, and behavioral. Emotional responses involved strong affective reactions such as anger, fear, helplessness, or humor as a coping strategy. Cognitive responses were characterized by analytical credibility assessment, including attention to authorship, language quality, logical coherence, and trusted institutional sources. Behavioral responses reflected self-regulation strategies such as deleting messages, blocking senders, limiting exposure, or verifying information through trusted social ties. In addition, three combined response patterns emerged: emotional–behavioral, behavioral–cognitive, and cognitive – emotional. Emotional–behavioral responses were most frequent, with intense affect often leading directly to sharing or commenting without prior verification. Behavioral–cognitive responses involved action preceding reflection, while cognitive – emotional responses began with analytical evaluation followed by affective reaction. The findings suggest that older adults’ responses are neither homogeneous nor purely deficit-based, but represent adaptive strategies shaped by life experience, digital confidence, and social responsibility. The results provide a basis for more targeted prevention and intervention programs for older adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Gerontology
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2026.2713648
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Share, verify, or ignore? Analysis of older adults’ responses to misinformation and disinformation

Ludmila Trochtová, Helena Pospíšilová, Pavlína Jurníčková, Tereza Kolumber et al.
Educational Gerontology
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Share, verify, or ignore? Analysis of older adults’ responses to misinformation and disinformation

Ludmila Trochtová, Helena Pospíšilová, Pavlína Jurníčková, Tereza Kolumber, Romana Mazalová
article en

Abstract

As digital environments increasingly shape everyday life in later adulthood, older adults are exposed to growing volumes of misinformation and disinformation. Understanding how they interpret and manage misleading content is essential for developing effective educational interventions. Less is also known about the combination of emotional, cognitive, and behavioral responses to misinformation and disinformation in older adults. This qualitative study explores how adults aged 65+ respond to misinformation and disinformation and identifies recurring response patterns. Sixty-three semi-structured interviews conducted across the Czech Republic were analyzed using thematic analysis. Three dominant response types were identified: emotional, cognitive, and behavioral. Emotional responses involved strong affective reactions such as anger, fear, helplessness, or humor as a coping strategy. Cognitive responses were characterized by analytical credibility assessment, including attention to authorship, language quality, logical coherence, and trusted institutional sources. Behavioral responses reflected self-regulation strategies such as deleting messages, blocking senders, limiting exposure, or verifying information through trusted social ties. In addition, three combined response patterns emerged: emotional–behavioral, behavioral–cognitive, and cognitive – emotional. Emotional–behavioral responses were most frequent, with intense affect often leading directly to sharing or commenting without prior verification. Behavioral–cognitive responses involved action preceding reflection, while cognitive – emotional responses began with analytical evaluation followed by affective reaction. The findings suggest that older adults’ responses are neither homogeneous nor purely deficit-based, but represent adaptive strategies shaped by life experience, digital confidence, and social responsibility. The results provide a basis for more targeted prevention and intervention programs for older adults.

Educational Gerontology
Palacký University Olomouc (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.