On the Concept of Existential Disease

Is "existential disease" a meaningful concept? This study scrutinizes six arguments in support of the concept. First, putative existential diseases are already discussed in the academic literature, including existential neurosis and existential OCD. Second, existential disease may be understood as occurring in the absence of "existential health," a notion that has received increasing scholarly attention. Third, the very practices of diagnosing "existential suffering" and providing "existential therapy" appear to entail a concept of existential disease. Fourth, in the same way as physical and mental suffering corresponds to physical and mental disease, existential suffering corresponds to existential disease. Fifth, existential suffering arguably falls under several traditional definitions of disease, thereby supporting the legitimacy of the concept of existential disease. Sixth, medical interventions such as palliative sedation and assisted dying in response to existential suffering-interventions typically reserved for disease-seem to presuppose an existential form of disease. Although most of these arguments face important objections, certain conceptions of disease do warrant the category of existential disease. Nonetheless, there is a substantial risk of medicalizing existential concerns, and it is not clear that framing existential suffering as disease is the best way to respond to those who suffer existentially, especially given that health professionals may not be well equipped to address such forms of distress. Hence, more and better arguments are needed to ascertain the concept of existential disease.