With intention, moving safely: Relational decision-making at the heart of evaluation bricolage

This article discusses how evaluation bricolage, when foregrounded by relationality and informed by multicultural validity, offers potential for transparent decision-making within evaluative bricolage. The authors intentionally explore the risks and the opportunities that lie within weaving paradigms, something often not spoken of in evaluation bricolage. In doing so, they advocate for a shift in paradigm to indigeneity that centres being in relationship and relational accountability as primary conditions of bricolage. The authors state that applying multicultural validity as a supportive decision-making framework can broaden our ability to centre context, culture and values within bricolage. In turn, ways of knowing, being and doing that strengthen the overall trustworthiness of evaluation, including bricolage, can be brought forward. Finally, the authors illustrate, through an example from evaluation practice, how multicultural validity centred on relational accountability acknowledges and legitimises diverse worldviews, value systems and knowledge traditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Evaluation
Published
2026-08-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890261462139
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

With intention, moving safely: Relational decision-making at the heart of evaluation bricolage

Alicia Crocket, Deborah Goodwin, Kate McKegg, Louise Moana Were
Evaluation
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

With intention, moving safely: Relational decision-making at the heart of evaluation bricolage

Alicia Crocket, Deborah Goodwin, Kate McKegg, Louise Moana Were
article en

Abstract

This article discusses how evaluation bricolage, when foregrounded by relationality and informed by multicultural validity, offers potential for transparent decision-making within evaluative bricolage. The authors intentionally explore the risks and the opportunities that lie within weaving paradigms, something often not spoken of in evaluation bricolage. In doing so, they advocate for a shift in paradigm to indigeneity that centres being in relationship and relational accountability as primary conditions of bricolage. The authors state that applying multicultural validity as a supportive decision-making framework can broaden our ability to centre context, culture and values within bricolage. In turn, ways of knowing, being and doing that strengthen the overall trustworthiness of evaluation, including bricolage, can be brought forward. Finally, the authors illustrate, through an example from evaluation practice, how multicultural validity centred on relational accountability acknowledges and legitimises diverse worldviews, value systems and knowledge traditions.

Evaluation
Government of New Zealand (NZ), Collaborative Group (United States) (US), Clinical Trials New Zealand (NZ)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.