Clinical Utility of a Type 1 Diabetes Genetic Risk Score Measured as Part of MODY Genetic Testing

<p dir="ltr">Objective</p><p dir="ltr">To evaluate the clinical utility of incorporating a type 1 diabetes genetic risk score (T1DGRS) into monogenic diabetes gene panel testing for individuals referred with suspected maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) from routine clinical practice.</p><p dir="ltr">Research Design and Methods</p><p dir="ltr">We studied 1,129 insulin-treated individuals referred for MODY genetic testing. All underwent gene panel testing including 10 variants to calculate T1DGRS. We compared T1DGRS distributions with reference populations to estimate the T1D prevalence within referrals. We defined age-specific T1DGRS thresholds to identify probable T1D (positive predictive value ≥80%) and applied them in genetically unsolved individuals to assess its utility as a pre-genetic testing triage tool.</p><p dir="ltr">Results</p><p dir="ltr">T1DGRS in MODY referrals was intermediate between T1D and non-T1D reference populations, consistent with an estimated 20% (95% CI 14.9–25.2) T1D in this real-world setting. After genetic testing, no excess T1DGRS was observed in solved-MODY whereas unsolved-MODY cases showed enrichment consistent with 26.0% T1D, highest in children (76.2%) and lowest in adults (16.8%). Age-specific T1DGRS thresholds identified 16.1% (95% CI 13.8–18.5%) of genetically unsolved as probable T1D. As a pre-testing tool, T1DGRS showed limited discrimination overall (AUC 0.60), but performed well in children under 10years (AUC 0.83), where >50% of tests could be avoided without missing MODY.</p><p><br></p><p dir="ltr">Conclusions</p><p dir="ltr">Incorporating a T1DGRS into routine MODY gene panel referrals is feasible and clinically valuable. This approach broadens genomic diagnostics beyond monogenic disease by identifying T1D in genetically unsolved cases. Pre-genetic testing utility is age dependent and may reduce unnecessary testing in paediatric patients.</p><p><br></p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Care
Published
2026-08-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2337/dc26-1081
Primary Topic
Pancreatic function and diabetes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Utility of a Type 1 Diabetes Genetic Risk Score Measured as Part of MODY Genetic Testing

Jacques Murray Leech, Thomas W. Laver, Kevin Colclough, Jayne A.L. Houghton et al.
Diabetes Care
Pancreatic function and diabetes
article

Clinical Utility of a Type 1 Diabetes Genetic Risk Score Measured as Part of MODY Genetic Testing

Jacques Murray Leech, Thomas W. Laver, Kevin Colclough, Jayne A.L. Houghton, Aparajita Sriram, Kashyap A. Patel, Andrew T. Hattersley
article en

Abstract

<p dir="ltr">Objective</p><p dir="ltr">To evaluate the clinical utility of incorporating a type 1 diabetes genetic risk score (T1DGRS) into monogenic diabetes gene panel testing for individuals referred with suspected maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) from routine clinical practice.</p><p dir="ltr">Research Design and Methods</p><p dir="ltr">We studied 1,129 insulin-treated individuals referred for MODY genetic testing. All underwent gene panel testing including 10 variants to calculate T1DGRS. We compared T1DGRS distributions with reference populations to estimate the T1D prevalence within referrals. We defined age-specific T1DGRS thresholds to identify probable T1D (positive predictive value ≥80%) and applied them in genetically unsolved individuals to assess its utility as a pre-genetic testing triage tool.</p><p dir="ltr">Results</p><p dir="ltr">T1DGRS in MODY referrals was intermediate between T1D and non-T1D reference populations, consistent with an estimated 20% (95% CI 14.9–25.2) T1D in this real-world setting. After genetic testing, no excess T1DGRS was observed in solved-MODY whereas unsolved-MODY cases showed enrichment consistent with 26.0% T1D, highest in children (76.2%) and lowest in adults (16.8%). Age-specific T1DGRS thresholds identified 16.1% (95% CI 13.8–18.5%) of genetically unsolved as probable T1D. As a pre-testing tool, T1DGRS showed limited discrimination overall (AUC 0.60), but performed well in children under 10years (AUC 0.83), where >50% of tests could be avoided without missing MODY.</p><p><br></p><p dir="ltr">Conclusions</p><p dir="ltr">Incorporating a T1DGRS into routine MODY gene panel referrals is feasible and clinically valuable. This approach broadens genomic diagnostics beyond monogenic disease by identifying T1D in genetically unsolved cases. Pre-genetic testing utility is age dependent and may reduce unnecessary testing in paediatric patients.</p><p><br></p>

Diabetes Care
University of Exeter (GB), Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust (GB), NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Pancreatic function and diabetes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.