Navigating light and noise: Behavioural underpinnings of bat responses to anthropogenic disturbance

More than 50% of bat species have unknown or declining population trends, often driven by human-induced rapid environmental change. Efforts to safeguard these species are hindered by knowledge gaps regarding the effects of anthropogenic stressors on the behaviour of wild bats. Artificial Light At Night (ALAN) and anthropogenic noise represent two widespread environmental stressors to which many bats are sensitive because they are nocturnal, and echolocating species depend heavily on sound for both communication and navigation. Here, we review evidence for the behavioural impacts of ALAN and anthropogenic noise across 146 studies. First, we summarise underlying mechanisms via which these stressors can affect bat behaviour. We then evaluate their impacts across contexts (foraging, drinking, commuting, emergence and within roost), considering their (a) individual and (b) interactive effects. Overall, both stressors were associated with avoidance of disturbed areas and changes in foraging behaviour, whereas only ALAN consistently altered emergence behaviour. Clutter-adapted species were generally more sensitive, however, substantial behavioural plasticity was evident, and generalisations were limited by methodological variation across studies. Most studies relied on coarse activity metrics (58%), few examined in-roost behaviour (7%), and only 4% quantified both illuminance and noise amplitude. Although most studies did not explicitly test for interactive effects, available evidence suggests non-additive outcomes. We advocate for increased attention to within-roost behavioural responses and the adoption of a multistressor framework. Priority research directions include integrating behavioural and physiological measures and evaluating the fitness consequences of behavioural change. Together, these efforts will strengthen conservation strategies and inform research in other sensitive taxa.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Conservation
Published
2026-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2026.112053
Primary Topic
Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating light and noise: Behavioural underpinnings of bat responses to anthropogenic disturbance

Christina Stanley, Camilla Soravia, Tessa E. Smith, Lucy M. W. Morison
Biological Conservation
Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
article

Navigating light and noise: Behavioural underpinnings of bat responses to anthropogenic disturbance

Christina Stanley, Camilla Soravia, Tessa E. Smith, Lucy M. W. Morison
article en

Abstract

More than 50% of bat species have unknown or declining population trends, often driven by human-induced rapid environmental change. Efforts to safeguard these species are hindered by knowledge gaps regarding the effects of anthropogenic stressors on the behaviour of wild bats. Artificial Light At Night (ALAN) and anthropogenic noise represent two widespread environmental stressors to which many bats are sensitive because they are nocturnal, and echolocating species depend heavily on sound for both communication and navigation. Here, we review evidence for the behavioural impacts of ALAN and anthropogenic noise across 146 studies. First, we summarise underlying mechanisms via which these stressors can affect bat behaviour. We then evaluate their impacts across contexts (foraging, drinking, commuting, emergence and within roost), considering their (a) individual and (b) interactive effects. Overall, both stressors were associated with avoidance of disturbed areas and changes in foraging behaviour, whereas only ALAN consistently altered emergence behaviour. Clutter-adapted species were generally more sensitive, however, substantial behavioural plasticity was evident, and generalisations were limited by methodological variation across studies. Most studies relied on coarse activity metrics (58%), few examined in-roost behaviour (7%), and only 4% quantified both illuminance and noise amplitude. Although most studies did not explicitly test for interactive effects, available evidence suggests non-additive outcomes. We advocate for increased attention to within-roost behavioural responses and the adoption of a multistressor framework. Priority research directions include integrating behavioural and physiological measures and evaluating the fitness consequences of behavioural change. Together, these efforts will strengthen conservation strategies and inform research in other sensitive taxa.

Biological ConservationVol. 322
University of Chester (GB), The University of Western Australia (AU)
Leverhulme Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.