Anti-enforcement Injunctions and the English Courts: From ‘Rare Beast’ to Common Beast?

The sanctions by the UK and European Union (EU) against Russia have raised difficult questions about upholding exclusive jurisdiction and arbitration clauses. One way of trying to uphold jurisdiction clauses is by granting injunctive relief to restrain the enforcement of any resulting judgment in breach of the same. This article examines the recent approach of the English Courts to granting Anti-Enforcement Injunctions (AEIs) which seek to restrain a party from enforcing a judgment obtained in a foreign Court in breach of a jurisdiction clause. Two shifts have occurred: the role of comity has been substantially marginalized; and the English Courts have been willing to grant AEI relief on a pre-emptive basis before any foreign judgment is rendered. The article argues that whilst these developments reflect an appropriate response to the use of Russian legislation to circumvent arbitration agreements and exclusive jurisdiction clauses, the Russian cases should be understood as exceptional and may not represent a permanent recalibration by the English Courts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Arbitration
Published
2026-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/joia2026028
Primary Topic
International Arbitration and Investment Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Anti-enforcement Injunctions and the English Courts: From ‘Rare Beast’ to Common Beast?

Hakeem Seriki
Journal of International Arbitration
International Arbitration and Investment Law
article

Anti-enforcement Injunctions and the English Courts: From ‘Rare Beast’ to Common Beast?

Hakeem Seriki
article en

Abstract

The sanctions by the UK and European Union (EU) against Russia have raised difficult questions about upholding exclusive jurisdiction and arbitration clauses. One way of trying to uphold jurisdiction clauses is by granting injunctive relief to restrain the enforcement of any resulting judgment in breach of the same. This article examines the recent approach of the English Courts to granting Anti-Enforcement Injunctions (AEIs) which seek to restrain a party from enforcing a judgment obtained in a foreign Court in breach of a jurisdiction clause. Two shifts have occurred: the role of comity has been substantially marginalized; and the English Courts have been willing to grant AEI relief on a pre-emptive basis before any foreign judgment is rendered. The article argues that whilst these developments reflect an appropriate response to the use of Russian legislation to circumvent arbitration agreements and exclusive jurisdiction clauses, the Russian cases should be understood as exceptional and may not represent a permanent recalibration by the English Courts.

Journal of International ArbitrationVol. 43(Issue 5)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
International Arbitration and Investment Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Anti-enforcement Injunctions and the English Courts: From ‘Rare Beast’ to Common Beast? — Hakeem Seriki · Journal of International Arbitration (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS