How intentional is incidental learning? Learners, words, task types, and learning gains

This study explored learners’ self-reported intentions to memorize new vocabulary during different language activities. Specifically, we investigated whether intentionality varies across learners, tasks, and words, and how intentionality is related to vocabulary learning gains. Fifty-two English as a Foreign Language students at a Japanese university were randomly assigned to one of four task conditions: reading, gap-filling, sentence-writing, and composition-writing. Subsequently, students rated their learning intentionality for each target word on a 5-point Likert scale. The learning of the target words was assessed using unannounced meaning-recall and meaning-recognition tests. The results showed that, while intentionality varied across words and tasks, the greatest variance was among participants. Sentence-writing tended to elicit higher intentionality than reading and composition-writing. Neither proficiency nor word length was associated with intentionality. Intentionality was strongly related to learning in gap-filling and sentence-writing, but not clearly in composition-writing or in reading. These findings suggest that intention plays an important role in what is perceived as incidental learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Second language Research
Published
2026-10-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583261483404
Primary Topic
Memory Processes and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How intentional is incidental learning? Learners, words, task types, and learning gains

Akifumi Yanagisawa, Batia Laufer
Second language Research
Memory Processes and Influences
article

How intentional is incidental learning? Learners, words, task types, and learning gains

Akifumi Yanagisawa, Batia Laufer
article en

Abstract

This study explored learners’ self-reported intentions to memorize new vocabulary during different language activities. Specifically, we investigated whether intentionality varies across learners, tasks, and words, and how intentionality is related to vocabulary learning gains. Fifty-two English as a Foreign Language students at a Japanese university were randomly assigned to one of four task conditions: reading, gap-filling, sentence-writing, and composition-writing. Subsequently, students rated their learning intentionality for each target word on a 5-point Likert scale. The learning of the target words was assessed using unannounced meaning-recall and meaning-recognition tests. The results showed that, while intentionality varied across words and tasks, the greatest variance was among participants. Sentence-writing tended to elicit higher intentionality than reading and composition-writing. Neither proficiency nor word length was associated with intentionality. Intentionality was strongly related to learning in gap-filling and sentence-writing, but not clearly in composition-writing or in reading. These findings suggest that intention plays an important role in what is perceived as incidental learning.

Second language Research
University of Tsukuba (JP), University of Haifa (IL)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Memory Processes and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How intentional is incidental learning? Learners, words, task types, and learning gains — Akifumi Yanagisawa, Batia Laufer · Second language Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS